Literature DB >> 9152708

Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review.

A Moyer1.   

Abstract

Effective breast-conserving surgical techniques for early-stage disease were developed to improve breast cancer patients' quality of life. The literature comparing the psychosocial sequelae of these newer treatments with mastectomy is ambiguous and shows an unexpected lack of substantial benefits. To clarify these inconsistencies, meta-analytic methods were used to summarize the findings of 40 investigations. Mean weighted effect sizes were calculated for 6 psychosocial outcomes. Modest advantages for breast-conserving surgery were identified for psychological, marital-sexual, and social adjustment; body/self-image; and cancer-related fears and concerns. Method of assignment to treatment and timing of assessment were relevant for some outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152708     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.3.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  46 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Assessing the body image: relevance, application and instruments for oncological settings.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Annunziata; Lorena Giovannini; Barbara Muzzatti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Higher-intensity exercise helps cancer survivors remain motivated.

Authors:  Eric Martin; Claudio Battaglini; Beth Hands; Fiona L Naumann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Monica Morrow; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Commentary--surgical decisions after breast cancer: can patients be too involved in decision making?

Authors:  Nananda F Col; Christine Duffy; Carol Landau
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Cancer Impact Assessment among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Catherine M Alfano; Bonnie A McGregor; Alan Kuniyuki; Bryce B Reeve; Deborah J Bowen; Ashley Wilder Smith; Kathy B Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathleen E Malone; Patricia A Ganz; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Psychosocial effect of mastectomy versus conservative surgery in patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Isabel Monteiro-Grillo; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Marília Jorge
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Impact of physician-patient discussions on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Judy Y Chen; May L Tao; Diana Tisnado; Jennifer Malin; Clifford Ko; Martha Timmer; John L Adams; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Depression and sexual adjustment following breast cancer in low-income Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Kysa M Christie; Beth E Meyerowitz; Rose C Maly
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Breast-conserving surgery in Hong Kong Chinese women.

Authors:  Dacita Suen; Lorraine Chow; Ava Kwong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.