Literature DB >> 15959370

Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up.

Russel C Huang1, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Moe R Lim, Patrick Tropiano, Thierry Marnay.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic and chart review.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcome at 8.6-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are no studies on the relationship between TDR motion and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We reviewed 38 patients who underwent 1 or 2-level TDR implantation with 51 TDR. Flexion-extension ROM was measured on lateral radiographs. Clinical outcomes were measured at 8.6 years by modified Stauffer-Coventry scores, Oswestry Disability Questionnaires (ODQ), and subjective ratings of back pain, leg pain, and disability. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine if ROM was correlated with clinical outcome. Patients were divided into 2 groups by motion (< or = 5 degrees and > 5 degrees ). Statistical differences in outcome were sought.
RESULTS: Spearman rank correlation coefficient revealed weak-to-moderate but statistically significant associations between ROM and outcome for postoperative back pain (r = -0.35, P = 0.034), ODQ (r = -0.33, P = 0.046), and modified Stauffer-Coventry scores (r = 0.42, P = 0.0095). Patients with motion of > 5 degrees had superior outcomes in ODQ (mean difference 12.6 points, P = 0.026) and Stauffer-Coventry scores (mean difference 2.2 points, P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic ROM at 8.6-year follow-up was positively correlated with several outcomes measures. Patients with motion > 5 degrees had clinically modest but statistically better outcomes in ODQ and modifiedStauffer-Coventry scores. Longer follow-ups will be necessary to measure fully the impact of TDR ROM on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959370     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166528.67425.0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

1.  The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation.

Authors:  René Schmidt; U Obertacke; J Nothwang; C Ulrich; J Nowicki; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Controversial topics in surgery: degenerative disc disease: disc replacement. For.

Authors:  James Wilson-MacDonald; Nick Boeree
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiographic total disc replacement angle measurement accuracy using the Oxford Cobbometer: precision and bias.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Kosmas Stafylas; John McManus; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; René Schmidt; Heiko Reichel; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Consequences of patient position in the radiographic measurement of artificial disc replacement angles.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; John McManus; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Adjacent segment movement after monosegmental total disc replacement and monosegmental fusion of segments L4/5].

Authors:  M Däxle; T Kocak; F Lattig; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aesculap Activ-L artificial disc in the treatment of degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  James J Yue; Fred F Mo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.