Literature DB >> 19882178

Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.

Balkan Cakir1, Marcus Richter, Werner Schmoelz, René Schmidt, Heiko Reichel, Hans Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

With regard to the literature, several factors are considered to have an impact on postoperative mobility after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). As TDR results in a distraction of the ligamentous structures, theoretically the postoperatively disc height and ligamentous integrity have also an influence on biomechanics of a treated segment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resection and segmental distraction on range of motion (ROM). Six human, lumbar spines (L2-L3) were tested with pure moments of ±7.5 Nm in a spine loading apparatus. The ROM was determined in all three motion planes. Testing sequences included: (1) intact state, (2) 10 mm prosthesis (PLL intact), (3) 10 mm prosthesis (PLL resected), (4) 12 mm prosthesis (PLL resected). The prosthesis used was a prototype with a constrained design using the ball-and-socket principle. The implantation of the 10 mm prosthesis already increased the disc height significantly (intact: 9.9 mm; 10 mm prosthesis: 10.6 mm; 12 mm prosthesis: 12.7 mm). Compared to the intact status, the implantation of the 10 mm prosthesis resulted in an increase of ROM for flexion/extension (8.6° vs 10.8°; P = 0.245) and axial rotation (2.9° vs 4.5°; P = 0.028), whereas lateral bending decreased (9.0° vs 7.6°; P = 0.445). The resection of the PLL for the 10 mm prosthesis resulted in an increase of ROM in all motion planes compared to the 10 mm prosthesis with intact PLL (flexion/extension: 11.4°, P = 0.046; axial rotation: 5.1°, P = 0.046; lateral bending: 8.6°, P = 0.028). The subsequent implantation of a 12 mm prosthesis, with resected PLL, resulted in a significant decrease of ROM in all motion planes compared to the 10 mm prosthesis with intact PLL (flexion/extension: 8.4°, P = 0.028; axial rotation: 3.3°, P = 0.028; lateral bending: 5.1°, P = 0.028). Compared to the intact status, the 12 mm prosthesis with resected PLL only decreased lateral bending significantly while the 10 mm prosthesis with intact PLL increased axial rotation significantly. The resection of the PLL during TDR results in a significant increase of ROM in all three principle motion planes. But it still remains unclear if this increase which is in median not more than 1° may alter the clinical results. Moreover, the destabilizing effect of PLL resection can be reversed using a higher implant. The prosthesis height seems more crucial than PLL preservation to maintain the primary stability after TDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19882178      PMCID: PMC3377805          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1193-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane.

Authors:  Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim; Steven P Haman; Qaiser Shafiq; Nakul Karkare; Ashok Biyani; Vijay K Goel; Lee Woldenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.

Authors:  Manohar Panjabi; George Malcolmson; Edward Teng; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Gweneth Henderson; Hassan Serhan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chan Shik Shim; Sang-Ho Lee; Ho-Dong Shin; Han Sug Kang; Won-Chul Choi; Byungjoo Jung; Gun Choi; Yong Ahn; Seungcheol Lee; Ho Yeon Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement].

Authors:  M Weisskopf; J A K Ohnsorge; F Martini; F U Niethard; K Birnbaum
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.923

5.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  T David
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Y Shono; K Kaneda; K Abumi; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions.

Authors:  Manohar Panjabi; Gweneth Henderson; Celeste Abjornson; James Yue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients.

Authors:  Ilona M Punt; Violette M Visser; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Steven M Kurtz; Jop Antonis; Geert Willem H Schurink; André van Ooij
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Wolfram Käfer; Balkan Cakir; Stefan Midderhoff; Heiko Reichel; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Jeremy Goodsitt; Gerard Carandang; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

5.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Thomas M Shea; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.