Literature DB >> 15957775

The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for within-channel processing of interaural time delay.

Barrie A Edmonds1, John F Culling.   

Abstract

Across-frequency processing by common interaural time delay (ITD) in spatial unmasking was investigated by measuring speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for high- and low-frequency bands of target speech presented against concurrent speech or a noise masker. Experiment 1 indicated that presenting one of these target bands with an ITD of +500 micros and the other with zero ITD (like the masker) provided some release from masking, but full binaural advantage was only measured when both target bands were given an ITD of + 500 micros. Experiment 2 showed that full binaural advantage could also be achieved when the high- and low-frequency bands were presented with ITDs of equal but opposite magnitude (+/- 500 micros). In experiment 3, the masker was also split into high- and low-frequency bands with ITDs of equal but opposite magnitude (+/-500 micros). The ITD of the low-frequency target band matched that of the high-frequency masking band and vice versa. SRTs indicated that, as long as the target and masker differed in ITD within each frequency band, full binaural advantage could be achieved. These results suggest that the mechanism underlying spatial unmasking exploits differences in ITD independently within each frequency channel.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15957775     DOI: 10.1121/1.1880752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Griffin; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Sarah J Natale; Colton Clayton; Michael F Dorman; William A Yost; Yi Zhou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.