Literature DB >> 18272498

Reverse wave propagation in the cochlea.

Wenxuan He1, Anders Fridberger, Edward Porsov, Karl Grosh, Tianying Ren.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions, sounds generated by the inner ear, are widely used for diagnosing hearing disorders and studying cochlear mechanics. However, it remains unclear how emissions travel from their generation sites to the cochlear base. The prevailing view is that emissions reach the cochlear base via a backward-traveling wave, a slow-propagating transverse wave, along the cochlear partition. A different view is that emissions propagate to the cochlear base via the cochlear fluids as a compressional wave, a fast longitudinal wave. These theories were experimentally tested in this study by measuring basilar membrane (BM) vibrations at the cubic distortion product (DP) frequency from two longitudinal locations with a laser interferometer. Generation sites of DPs were varied by changing frequencies of primary tones while keeping the frequency ratio constant. Here, we show that BM vibration amplitude and phase at the DP frequency are very similar to responses evoked by external tones. Importantly, the BM vibration phase at a basal location leads that at a more apical location, indicating a traveling wave that propagates in the forward direction. These data are in conflict with the backward- traveling-wave theory but are consistent with the idea that the emission comes out of the cochlea predominantly through compressional waves in the cochlear fluids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18272498      PMCID: PMC2268204          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708103105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Modeling the temporal behavior of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  A Tubis; C L Talmadge; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vibration of beads placed on the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the relationships between the fixed-f1, fixed-f2, and fixed-ratio phase derivatives of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  A Tubis; C L Talmadge; C Tong; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Amanda J Cerka; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells.

Authors:  A Hudspeth
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection.

Authors:  D M Mills; E W Rubel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate.

Authors:  J P Wilson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  36 in total

1.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Inverse-solution method for a class of non-classical cochlear models.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 8.  Instrumentation for studies of cochlear mechanics: from von Békésy forward.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Basilar membrane and tectorial membrane stiffness in the CBA/CaJ mouse.

Authors:  I U Teudt; C P Richter
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.