Literature DB >> 15952053

Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.

Qian-Jie Fu1, Geraldine Nogaki, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

After implantation, postlingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) patients must adapt to both spectrally reduced and spectrally shifted speech, due to the limited number of electrodes and the limited length of the electrode array. This adaptation generally occurs during the first three to six months of implant use and may continue for many years. To see whether moderate speech training can accelerate this learning process, 16 naïve, normal-hearing listeners were trained with spectrally shifted speech via an eight-channel acoustic simulation of CI speech processing. Baseline vowel and consonant recognition was measured for both spectrally shifted and unshifted speech. Short daily training sessions were conducted over five consecutive days, using four different protocols. For the test-only protocol, no improvement was seen over the five-day period. Similarly, sentence training provided little benefit for vowel recognition. However, after five days of targeted phoneme training, subjects' recognition of spectrally shifted vowels significantly improved in most subjects. This improvement did not generalize to the spectrally unshifted vowel and consonant tokens, suggesting that subjects adapted to the specific spectral shift, rather than to the eight-channel processing in general. Interestingly, significant improvement was also observed for the recognition of spectrally shifted consonants. The largest improvement was observed with targeted vowel contrast training, which did not include any explicit consonant training. These results suggest that targeted phoneme training can accelerate adaptation to spectrally shifted speech. Given these results with normal-hearing listeners, auditory rehabilitation tools that provide targeted phoneme training may be effective in improving the speech recognition performance of adult CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15952053      PMCID: PMC2538336          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-5061-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  18 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; D G Greenfield; J J Logemann; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Early and rapid perceptual learning.

Authors:  David J C Hawkey; Sygal Amitay; David R Moore
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Authors:  B A Wright; M B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  P W Dawson; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of auditory training on adult cochlear implant patients: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin; Xiaosong Wang; Geri Nogaki
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2004-09
View more
  52 in total

1.  Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-28

2.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

3.  Effects of computer-assisted speech training on Mandarin-speaking hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Jiunn-Liang Wu; Hui-Mei Yang; Yi-Hui Lin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Geraldine Nogaki; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

7.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Leonid M Litvak; Michael F Dorman; Ashley R Bohanan; Lakshmi N Mishra
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.