Literature DB >> 10946717

Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.

J A Stolz1, R S McCann.   

Abstract

Three experiments examine whether spatial attention and visual word recognition processes operate independently or interactively in a spatially cued lexical-decision task. Participants responded to target strings that had been preceded first by a prime word at fixation and then by an abrupt onset cue either above or below fixation. Targets appeared either in the cued (i.e., valid) or uncued (i.e., invalid) location. The proportion of validly cued trials and the proportion of semantically related prime-target pairs were manipulated independently. It is concluded that spatial attention and visual word recognition processes are best seen as interactive. Spatial attention affects word recognition in 2 distinct ways: (a) it affects the uptake of orthographic information, possibly acting as "glue" to hold letters in their proper places in words, and (b) it (partly) determines whether or not activation from the semantic level feeds down to the lexical level during word recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946717     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.4.1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Priming effects on temporal order judgments about words: perceived temporal priority or response bias?

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham; James H Neely; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  The effect of target context and cue type in a postcue word pronunciation task.

Authors:  Karen Murphy; Lauren Green
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-09-22

7.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.