Literature DB >> 15943558

Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

M Watson1, K M Kash, J Homewood, S Ebbs, V Murday, R Eeles.   

Abstract

Despite there being an increasing literature on the impact of cancer genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health, there is a lack of data describing impact on risk management. Genetic counseling and testing for cancer predisposition genes aims to improve the future health of those at high risk through appropriate surveillance and screening. However, management of breast cancer risk in women with a family history of this disease is an area of controversy. Counseling services may recommend specific risk management options to women, who then rely on their local screening service to make provision. This study investigated the impact of genetic counseling on management of breast cancer risk in women attending Cancer Family Clinics. A total of 293 women attending four genetic clinics were enrolled. Rates of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, mammography, biopsy, detected cancers, and other screenings were documented. Participants' perceived benefits and barriers to mammography were assessed along with cancer worry. Results show that rates of mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination were increased following clinic attendance (p < 0.001). Women in the under 35 age-group had limited access to screening. Rates for biopsy and detected cancers were low. Women reported positive attitudes to mammography, with few reported barriers. Contrary to previous studies, there was no evidence that anxiety about breast cancer impedes uptake of health surveillance methods. Genetic counseling had a positive impact on management of breast cancer risk. Whether this translates into future health gains remains to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943558     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2005.9.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  16 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Santanu K Datta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Gail P Hollowell; Henry F Beresford; Thomas Freeland; Benjamin Rogers; John Boling; P Kelly Marcom; Martha B Adams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anne Weidner; Courtney Lewis; Devon Bonner; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Identification of the prevalent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the female population of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Julie Dutil; Jose L Colon-Colon; Jaime L Matta; Rebecca Sutphen; Miguel Echenique
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012-05

Review 6.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Adherence to Recommended Risk Management among Unaffected Women with a BRCA Mutation.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Corrine I Voils; Joellen M Schildkraut; Catherine Fine; Nora K Horick; P Kelly Marcom; Kristi Wiggins; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Attitudes and compliance of clinical management after genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among high-risk Southern Chinese females with breast cancer history.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Annie Tsz-Wai Chu; Christine Teen-Sum Wu; Desiree Man-Sik Tse
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  The impact of breast cancer genetic risk assessment on intentions to perform cancer surveillance behaviors.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Kate Brain; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sonya Reid; Sydney Cadiz; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.