Literature DB >> 17549613

The impact of breast cancer genetic risk assessment on intentions to perform cancer surveillance behaviors.

Paul Bennett1, Clare Wilkinson, Jim Turner, Gethin Griffith, Barbara France, Kate Brain, Jonathon Gray.   

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-four women undergoing breast/ovarian cancer genetic risk assessment completed questionnaires at entry into the Cancer Genetic Service for Wales (CGSW) assessment program and following risk provision, mapping the strength of intentions to engage in a number of preventive/surveillance behaviors, including seeing specialists, breast self-examination, and involvement in screening programs, including mammography. A number of potential predictors of intentions were also assessed, including participants' mood and emotional response to receiving risk information, the perceived benefits (in terms of reassurance and early disease detection) of engaging in each preventive behavior, and the perceived desires of their family and General Practitioner. Intentions to self-examine did not change following risk provision, although strength of intentions to engage in some other preventive behaviors did lessen. Family and General Practitioners appeared to be strong social influences on behavioral intentions, as were the perceived benefits of gaining reassurance and/or early detection of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549613     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9100-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  29 in total

1.  GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice.

Authors:  A Fry; H Campbell; H Gudmunsdottir; R Rush; M Porteous; D Gorman; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Kevin D McCaul; Renee E Magnan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  The theory of reasoned action in prediction of breast self-examination: a comparison of two studies.

Authors:  G M Powell-Cope; L M Lierman; D Kasprzyk; H M Young; J Q Benoliel
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1991 Jan-Mar

4.  Perception of risk and surveillance practices of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wanda Martin; Lesley Degner
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Cancer-specific worry interference in women attending a breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation program: impact on emotional distress and health functioning.

Authors:  P C Trask; A G Paterson; C Wang; S Hayasaka; K J Milliron; L R Blumberg; R Gonzalez; S Murray; S D Merajver
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

Authors:  M Watson; K M Kash; J Homewood; S Ebbs; V Murday; R Eeles
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

7.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort.

Authors:  M Watson; C Foster; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; R Davidson; J Mackay; P J Morrison; P Hopwood; D G R Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact.

Authors:  A Fry; A Cull; S Appleton; R Rush; S Holloway; D Gorman; R Cetnarskyj; R Thomas; J Campbell; E Anderson; M Steel; M Porteous; H Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: effects of a breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S van Dijk; W Otten; M W Zoeteweij; D R M Timmermans; C J van Asperen; M H Breuning; R A E M Tollenaar; J Kievit
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Using a family history intervention to improve cancer risk perception in a black community.

Authors:  Vinaya S Murthy; Mary A Garza; Donna A Almario; Kristen J Vogel; Robin E Grubs; Elizabeth A Gettig; John W Wilson; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Attitudes and compliance of clinical management after genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among high-risk Southern Chinese females with breast cancer history.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Annie Tsz-Wai Chu; Christine Teen-Sum Wu; Desiree Man-Sik Tse
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients' First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mojtaba Fattahi Ardakani; Amin Salehi-Abargouei; Ahmad Sotoudeh; Somayyeh Esmaeildokht; Vali Bahrevar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.