Literature DB >> 25120038

Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Adam H Buchanan1, Carol A Christianson, Tiffany Himmel, Karen P Powell, Astrid Agbaje, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Vincent C Henrich, Lori A Orlando.   

Abstract

Several barriers inhibit collection and use of detailed family health history (FHH) in primary care. MeTree, a computer-based FHH intake and risk assessment tool with clinical decision support, was developed to overcome these barriers. Here, we describe the impact of MeTree on genetic counseling (GC) referrals and attendance. Non-adopted, English speaking adults scheduled for a well-visit in two community-based primary-care clinics were invited to participate in an Implementation-Effectiveness study of MeTree. Participants' demographic characteristics and beliefs were assessed at baseline. Immediately after an appointment with a patient for whom GC was recommended, clinicians indicated whether they referred the patient and, if not, why. The study genetic counselor kept a database of patients with a GC recommendation and contacted those with a referral. Of 542 patients completing MeTree, 156 (29 %) received a GC recommendation. Of these, 46 % (n = 72) were referred and 21 % (n = 33) underwent counseling. Patient preferences, additional clinical information unavailable to MeTree, and an incomplete clinician evaluation of the FHH accounted for the 85 patients clinicians chose not to refer. Although MeTree identified a significant proportion of patients for whom GC was recommended, persistent barriers indicate the need for improved referral processes and patient and physician education about the benefits of GC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25120038     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9753-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  41 in total

1.  Proband family uptake of familial-genetic counselling.

Authors:  L Hagoel; S Dishon; R Almog; Z Silman; S Bisland-Becktell; G Rennert
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Genomic medicine: who will practice it? A call to open arms.

Authors:  A E Guttmacher; J Jenkins; W R Uhlmann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

3.  Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; J L Benkendorf; B Biesecker; J Kerner; J Willison; N Eads; D Hadley; J Lynch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups.

Authors:  K Glanz; J Grove; C Lerman; C Gotay; L Le Marchand
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Cappelli; L Surh; L Humphreys; S Verma; D Logan; A Hunter; J Allanson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening.

Authors:  L S Acheson; G L Wiesner; S J Zyzanski; M A Goodwin; K C Stange
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services.

Authors:  S J Hayflick; M P Eiff; L Carpenter; J Steinberger
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  A comparative study of patients' perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia.

Authors:  Emily Qian; Meow-Keong Thong; Pamela Flodman; Jay Gargus
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  A model for patient-direct screening and referral for familial cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristin B Niendorf; Melissa A Geller; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Timothy R Church; Anna Leininger; Angela Bakke; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Applying theory to characterize impediments to dissemination of community-facing family health history tools: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Caitlin G Allen; Debra Duquette; Yue Guan; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-07-02

4.  Patient experience with family history tool: analysis of patients' experience sharing their family health history through patient-computer dialogue in a patient portal.

Authors:  Adarsha S Bajracharya; Bradley H Crotty; Hollis B Kowoloff; Charles Safran; Warner V Slack
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Parveen Ghani; Joshua D Schiffman; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachel Hess; Valli Chidambaram; Kensaku Kawamoto; Rosalie G Waller; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol; Charlene Weir
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-10-08

6.  Perceptions of Personalized Medicine in an Academic Health System: Educational Findings.

Authors:  Allison Vorderstrasse; Sara Huston Katsanis; Mollie A Minear; Nancy Yang; Tejinder Rakhra-Burris; Jason W Reeves; Robert Cook-Deegan; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Leigh Ann Simmons
Journal:  J Contemp Med Educ       Date:  2015

7.  Perspectives on genetic and genomic technologies in an academic medical center: the duke experience.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Mollie A Minear; Allison Vorderstrasse; Nancy Yang; Jason W Reeves; Tejinder Rakhra-Burris; Robert Cook-Deegan; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Leigh Ann Simmons
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-04-03

8.  Community-Based Family Health History Education: The Role of State Health Agencies in Engaging Medically Underserved Populations in Understanding Genomics and Risk of Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Laura Senier; Michael Shields; Rachael Lee; Lauren Nicoll; Danielle Falzon; Elyssa Wiecek
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-21

9.  Clinical utility of a Web-enabled risk-assessment and clinical decision support program.

Authors:  Lori A Orlando; R Ryanne Wu; Rachel A Myers; Adam H Buchanan; Vincent C Henrich; Elizabeth R Hauser; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Protocol for the "Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings" study.

Authors:  R Ryanne Wu; Rachel A Myers; Catherine A McCarty; David Dimmock; Michael Farrell; Deanna Cross; Troy D Chinevere; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.