Literature DB >> 25833335

Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.

Adam H Buchanan1, Santanu K Datta2,3, Celette Sugg Skinner4, Gail P Hollowell5, Henry F Beresford6, Thomas Freeland7, Benjamin Rogers8, John Boling6, P Kelly Marcom9,2, Martha B Adams2.   

Abstract

Telegenetics-genetic counseling via live videoconferencing-can improve access to cancer genetic counseling (CGC) in underserved areas, but studies on cancer telegenetics have not applied randomized methodology or assessed cost. We report cost, patient satisfaction and CGC attendance from a randomized trial comparing telegenetics with in-person CGC among individuals referred to CGC in four rural oncology clinics. Participants (n = 162) were randomized to receive CGC at their local oncology clinic in-person or via telegenetics. Cost analyses included telegenetics system; mileage; and personnel costs for genetic counselor, IT specialist, and clinic personnel. CGC attendance was tracked via study database. Patient satisfaction was assessed 1 week post-CGC via telephone survey using validated scales. Total costs were $106 per telegenetics patient and $244 per in-person patient. Patient satisfaction did not differ by group on either satisfaction scale. In-person patients were significantly more likely to attend CGC than telegenetics patients (89 vs. 79 %, p = 0.03), with bivariate analyses showing an association between lesser computer comfort and lower attendance rate (Chi-square = 5.49, p = 0.02). Our randomized trial of telegenetics vs. in-person counseling found that telegenetics cost less than in-person counseling, with high satisfaction among those who attended. This study provides support for future randomized trials comparing multiple service delivery models on longer-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genes; Cost analysis; Genetic counseling; Patient satisfaction; Telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25833335      PMCID: PMC4592683          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9836-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  29 in total

Review 1.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Telegenetics in Maine: Successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project.

Authors:  Dale Halsey Lea; Judith L Johnson; Sara Ellingwood; Walter Allan; Arvind Patel; Rosemarie Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Development and validation of a Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire.

Authors:  Joel Erblich; Karen Brown; Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Barbara E Livingston; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-02

4.  An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations.

Authors:  Jordanna Joaquina Coelho; Angela Arnold; Jeremy Nayler; Marc Tischkowitz; James MacKay
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters.

Authors:  J E Ware; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk.

Authors:  C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; J Benkendorf; J Kerner; C Isaacs; J Barter; C Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Angela Trepanier; Mary Ahrens; Wendy McKinnon; June Peters; Jill Stopfer; Sherry Campbell Grumet; Susan Manley; Julie O Culver; Ronald Acton; Joy Larsen-Haidle; Lori Ann Correia; Robin Bennett; Barbara Pettersen; Terri Diamond Ferlita; Josephine Wagner Costalas; Katherine Hunt; Susan Donlon; Cecile Skrzynia; Carolyn Farrell; Faith Callif-Daley; Catherine Walsh Vockley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Wenyi Wang; Shing Lee; Khedoudja Nafa; Johanna Lee; Kathy Romans; Patrice Watson; Stephen B Gruber; David Euhus; Kenneth W Kinzler; Jeremy Jass; Steven Gallinger; Noralane M Lindor; Graham Casey; Nathan Ellis; Francis M Giardiello; Kenneth Offit; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

Authors:  M Watson; K M Kash; J Homewood; S Ebbs; V Murday; R Eeles
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

Review 10.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  49 in total

1.  Understanding of multigene test results among males undergoing germline testing for inherited prostate cancer: Implications for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Veda N Giri; Elias Obeid; Sarah E Hegarty; Laura Gross; Lisa Bealin; Colette Hyatt; Carolyn Y Fang; Amy Leader
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.

Authors:  Nan M Solomons; Amanda E Lamb; Frances L Lucas; Eileen F McDonald; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 4.  Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Jennifer Bergstrom; Goli Samimi; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Persistent Underutilization of BRCA1/2 Testing Suggest the Need for New Approaches to Genetic Testing Delivery.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The State of Cancer Care in America, 2016: A Report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Physician Experiences and Understanding of Genomic Sequencing in Oncology.

Authors:  Caroline M Weipert; Kerry A Ryan; Jessica N Everett; Beverly M Yashar; Arul M Chinnaiyan; J Scott Roberts; Raymond De Vries; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Victoria M Raymond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Telegenetics: an Update on Availability and Use of Telemedicine in Clinical Genetics Service.

Authors:  Irena Vrečar; Dimitar Hristovski; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Implementing a Virtual Health Telemedicine Program in a Community Setting.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Kate Zellmer; Nicole Gill; Deborah Wham
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.