Literature DB >> 15915796

Eye movements are functional during face learning.

John M Henderson1, Carrick C Williams, Richard J Falk.   

Abstract

In a free viewing learning condition, participants were allowed to move their eyes naturally as they learned a set of new faces. In a restricted viewing learning condition, participants remained fixated in a single central location as they learned the new faces. Recognition of the learned faces was then tested following the two learning conditions. Eye movements were recorded during the free viewing learning condition, as well as during recognition. The recognition results showed a clear deficit following the restricted viewing condition, compared with the free viewing condition, demonstrating that eye movements play a functional role during human face learning. Furthermore, the features selected for fixation during recognition were similar following free viewing and restricted viewing learning, suggesting that the eye movements generated during recognition are not simply a recapitulation of those produced during learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915796     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces.

Authors:  S Dubois; B Rossion; C Schiltz; J M Bodart; C Michel; R Bruyer; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; J C Gore; T Allison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Eye movement strategies involved in face perception.

Authors:  G J Walker-Smith; A G Gale; J M Findlay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.

Authors:  I Mertens; H Siegmund; O J Grüsser
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.

Authors:  A W Young; D C Hay; K H McWeeny; B M Flude; A W Ellis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces.

Authors:  S W Janik; A R Wellens; M L Goldberg; L F Dell'Osso
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1978-12

9.  Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.

Authors:  H D Ellis; J W Shepherd; G M Davies
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Prosopamnesia: a selective impairment in face learning.

Authors:  L J Tippett; L A Miller; M J Farah
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  86 in total

1.  Eye movements during information processing tasks: individual differences and cultural effects.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Xingshan Li; Carrick C Williams; Kyle R Cave; Arnold D Well
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

3.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Gaze patterns during identity and emotion judgments in hearing adults and deaf users of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Susan M Letourneau; Teresa V Mitchell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Neural Representations of Faces Are Tuned to Eye Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Stacchi; Meike Ramon; Junpeng Lao; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Intentionally distracting: Working memory is disrupted by the perception of other agents attending to you - even without eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Clara Colombatto; Benjamin van Buren; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

7.  Comparing social attention in autism and amygdala lesions: effects of stimulus and task condition.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Moran Cerf; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.