Literature DB >> 30867260

Neural Representations of Faces Are Tuned to Eye Movements.

Lisa Stacchi1, Meike Ramon1, Junpeng Lao1, Roberto Caldara2.   

Abstract

Eye movements provide a functional signature of how human vision is achieved. Many recent studies have consistently reported robust idiosyncratic visual sampling strategies during face recognition. Whether these interindividual differences are mirrored by idiosyncratic neural responses remains unknown. To this aim, we first tracked eye movements of male and female observers during face recognition. Additionally, for every observer we obtained an objective index of neural face discrimination through EEG that was recorded while they fixated different facial information. We found that foveation of facial features fixated longer during face recognition elicited stronger neural face discrimination responses across all observers. This relationship occurred independently of interindividual differences in preferential facial information sampling (e.g., eye vs mouth lookers), and started as early as the first fixation. Our data show that eye movements play a functional role during face processing by providing the neural system with the information that is diagnostic to a specific observer. The effective processing of identity involves idiosyncratic, rather than universal face representations.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT When engaging in face recognition, observers deploy idiosyncratic fixation patterns to sample facial information. Whether these individual differences concur with idiosyncratic face-sensitive neural responses remains unclear. To address this issue, we recorded observers' fixation patterns, as well as their neural face discrimination responses elicited during fixation of 10 different locations on the face, corresponding to different types of facial information. Our data reveal a clear interplay between individuals' face-sensitive neural responses and their idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns during identity processing, which emerges as early as the first fixation. Collectively, our findings favor the existence of idiosyncratic, rather than universal face representations.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; eye movements; face discrimination; fast periodic visual stimulation; individual differences

Year:  2019        PMID: 30867260      PMCID: PMC6529871          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2968-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

1.  The Eyelink Toolbox: eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  Frans W Cornelissen; Enno M Peters; John Palmer
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-11

2.  Local Jekyll and global Hyde: the dual identity of face identification.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Roberto Caldara; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-11-10

3.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.

Authors:  F Gosselin; P G Schyns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity?

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Marianne Latinus; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data.

Authors:  Marcus Nyström; Kenneth Holmqvist
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

Review 6.  Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond.

Authors:  A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Eye movements are functional during face learning.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Carrick C Williams; Richard J Falk
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

8.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans.

Authors:  Shlomo Bentin; Truett Allison; Aina Puce; Erik Perez; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Luca Vizioli; Lingnan He; Xinyue Zhou; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Culture shapes how we look at faces.

Authors:  Caroline Blais; Rachael E Jack; Christoph Scheepers; Daniel Fiset; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED).

Authors:  Kay Robbins; Dung Truong; Stefan Appelhoff; Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Atypical gaze patterns in autistic adults are heterogeneous across but reliable within individuals.

Authors:  Daniel P Kennedy; Ralph Adolphs; Umit Keles; Dorit Kliemann; Lisa Byrge; Heini Saarimäki; Lynn K Paul
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.476

3.  Long term fMRI adaptation depends on adapter response in face-selective cortex.

Authors:  Daphne Stam; Yun-An Huang; Kristof Vansteelandt; Stefan Sunaert; Ron Peeters; Charlotte Sleurs; Leia Vrancken; Louise Emsell; Rufin Vogels; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Jan Van den Stock
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-10

4.  Strategies Used by Musicians to Identify Notes' Pitch: Cognitive Bricks and Mental Representations.

Authors:  Alain Letailleur; Erica Bisesi; Pierre Legrain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-07

5.  Concealed information revealed by involuntary eye movements on the fringe of awareness in a mock terror experiment.

Authors:  Gal Rosenzweig; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.