Literature DB >> 3837875

Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.

A W Young, D C Hay, K H McWeeny, B M Flude, A W Ellis.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which subjects were asked to match a photograph of a complete face and a simultaneously presented photograph of internal or external features of a face, deciding whether or not the two photographs were pictures of the same person. In experiment 1 'same' pairs were derived from different pictures of the same face, so that subjects had to match the faces and not the particular photographs used. Matches based on internal features were found to be faster for familiar than for unfamiliar faces, whereas there was no difference in reaction time between matches based on the external features of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Faster matching of internal features of familiar faces was found to hold equally for pairs of photographs that differed in orientation of the face or in facial expression. In experiment 2 'same' pairs were derived from the same photographs, which gave subjects the choice of matching on the basis of the features of the depicted faces or matching the photographs. Reaction times were faster than in experiment 1, and there were no differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. The study confirms reports of differential saliency of the internal features of familiar faces, and shows that this only holds when stimuli are treated as faces. The finding thus reflects properties of structural rather than pictorial codes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3837875     DOI: 10.1068/p140737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  41 in total

1.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces: a visual half-field study.

Authors:  Edward H F De Haan; Evelien N M van Kollenburg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-08-11

5.  The time course of processing external and internal features of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Bozana Veres-Injac; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-18

6.  Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: implications for holistic face processing.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Yan Dong; Paul C Quinn; Wen S Xiao; Qiandong Wang; Guowei Chen; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The contribution of external and internal features to the matching of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  I Nachson; M Moscovitch; C Umilta
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

8.  The representation of nonstructural information in visual memory: evidence from image combination.

Authors:  P Walker; G J Hitch; S A Dewhurst; H E Whiteley; M A Brandimonte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

Review 9.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition.

Authors:  I Biederman; P Kalocsai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Yosuke Kita; Atsuko Gunji; Kotoe Sakihara; Masumi Inagaki; Makiko Kaga; Eiji Nakagawa; Toru Hosokawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.