Literature DB >> 15902864

The measurement of creep in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: a comparison of conventional versus highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Daniel M Estok1, Charles R Bragdon, Gordon R Plank, Anna Huang, Orhun K Muratoglu, William H Harris.   

Abstract

Quantification of creep of highly cross-linked polyethylene would enable separation of creep from wear when evaluating femoral head penetration into polyethylene. We compared creep magnitude of a highly cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene in the laboratory. Twelve acetabular liners of each material were tested, 6 of which had a 32-mm inner diameter (ID) and 6 had 28-mm ID. Creep was measured using coordinate measuring machines during loading at 2 Hz without motion to 4 million cycles. Penetration into 32-mm ID conventional liners reached 97 microm versus 107 microm for highly cross-linked material, not significant. Penetration into 28-mm conventional liners was 132 microm versus 155 microm for highly cross-linked material (P = .017). Ninety percent of the creep had occurred by 2.5 million cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902864     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Wear is reduced in THA performed with highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Authors:  Burak Beksaç; Antonio Salas; Alejandro González Della Valle; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Endoprosthetic wear analysis using virtual CAD-based radiographs].

Authors:  M Haversath; S Klebingat; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Wear of a 5 megarad cross-linked polyethylene liner: a 6-year RSA study.

Authors:  Stuart A Callary; David G Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G Nilsson; John R Field
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners.

Authors:  Hee-Nee Pang; Douglas D R Naudie; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Matthew G Teeter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 36-mm Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene-Minimum Seven-years Follow-up.

Authors:  Won-Kee Choi; Myung-Rae Cho; Joo-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  Poor performance of Enduron polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year follow up and ultra-morphological analysis of wear particles.

Authors:  Yufei Yan; Hao Chen; Jianmin Feng; Kaizhe Chen; Kaidi Zhou; Weixiang Hong; Yi Wang; Zhihong Liu; Jiong Zhang; Qingming Yang; Lei Guo; Chuan He
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Second-generation highly cross-linked X3™ polyethylene wear: a preliminary radiostereometric analysis study.

Authors:  David G Campbell; John R Field; Stuart A Callary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Christina Esposito; Marcella Elpers; Timothy Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Wear Rates of XLPE Nearly 50% Lower Than Previously Thought After Adjusting for Initial Creep: An RCT Comparing 4 Bearing Combinations.

Authors:  Amir Khoshbin; James Wu; Sarah Ward; Luana T Melo; Emil H Schemitsch; James P Waddell; Amit Atrey
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-06-05

10.  A simple method of measuring the wear of explanted acetabular component inserts.

Authors:  L Krakow; A Klockow; E Roehner; S Brodt; H Eijer; J Bossert; G Matziolis
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.