Literature DB >> 15890445

Active pixel sensor array as a detector for electron microscopy.

Anna-Clare Milazzo1, Philippe Leblanc, Fred Duttweiler, Liang Jin, James C Bouwer, Steve Peltier, Mark Ellisman, Fred Bieser, Howard S Matis, Howard Wieman, Peter Denes, Stuart Kleinfelder, Nguyen-Huu Xuong.   

Abstract

A new high-resolution recording device for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is urgently needed. Neither film nor CCD cameras are systems that allow for efficient 3-D high-resolution particle reconstruction. We tested an active pixel sensor (APS) array as a replacement device at 200, 300, and 400 keV using a JEOL JEM-2000 FX II and a JEM-4000 EX electron microscope. For this experiment, we used an APS prototype with an area of 64 x 64 pixels of 20 microm x 20 microm pixel pitch. Single-electron events were measured by using very low beam intensity. The histogram of the incident electron energy deposited in the sensor shows a Landau distribution at low energies, as well as unexpected events at higher absorbed energies. After careful study, we concluded that backscattering in the silicon substrate and re-entering the sensitive epitaxial layer a second time with much lower speed caused the unexpected events. Exhaustive simulation experiments confirmed the existence of these back-scattered electrons. For the APS to be usable, the back-scattered electron events must be eliminated, perhaps by thinning the substrate to less than 30 microm. By using experimental data taken with an APS chip with a standard silicon substrate (300 microm) and adjusting the results to take into account the effect of a thinned silicon substrate (30 microm), we found an estimate of the signal-to-noise ratio for a back-thinned detector in the energy range of 200-400 keV was about 10:1 and an estimate for the spatial resolution was about 10 microm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890445     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  25 in total

1.  Initial evaluation of a direct detection device detector for single particle cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Anna-Clare Milazzo; Anchi Cheng; Arne Moeller; Dmitry Lyumkis; Erica Jacovetty; James Polukas; Mark H Ellisman; Nguyen-Huu Xuong; Bridget Carragher; Clinton S Potter
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Direct electron detection yields cryo-EM reconstructions at resolutions beyond 3/4 Nyquist frequency.

Authors:  Benjamin E Bammes; Ryan H Rochat; Joanita Jakana; Dong-Hua Chen; Wah Chiu
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Applications of direct detection device in transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Liang Jin; Anna-Clare Milazzo; Stuart Kleinfelder; Shengdong Li; Philippe Leblanc; Fred Duttweiler; James C Bouwer; Steven T Peltier; Mark H Ellisman; Nguyen-Huu Xuong
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Characterization of a direct detection device imaging camera for transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Anna-Clare Milazzo; Grigore Moldovan; Jason Lanman; Liang Jin; James C Bouwer; Stuart Klienfelder; Steven T Peltier; Mark H Ellisman; Angus I Kirkland; Nguyen-Huu Xuong
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 5.  Reconstructing virus structures from nanometer to near-atomic resolutions with cryo-electron microscopy and tomography.

Authors:  Juan Chang; Xiangan Liu; Ryan H Rochat; Matthew L Baker; Wah Chiu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Near-atomic resolution reconstructions of icosahedral viruses from electron cryo-microscopy.

Authors:  Nikolaus Grigorieff; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Improving signal to noise in labeled biological specimens using energy-filtered TEM of sections with a drift correction strategy and a direct detection device.

Authors:  Ranjan Ramachandra; James C Bouwer; Mason R Mackey; Eric Bushong; Steven T Peltier; Nguyen-Huu Xuong; Mark H Ellisman
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.127

Review 8.  Molecular electron microscopy: state of the art and current challenges.

Authors:  Henning Stahlberg; Thomas Walz
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Beam-induced motion of vitrified specimen on holey carbon film.

Authors:  Axel F Brilot; James Z Chen; Anchi Cheng; Junhua Pan; Stephen C Harrison; Clinton S Potter; Bridget Carragher; Richard Henderson; Nikolaus Grigorieff
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 10.  Structural analysis of macromolecular assemblies by electron microscopy.

Authors:  E V Orlova; H R Saibil
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.