Literature DB >> 15887877

Distress associated with prenatal screening for fetal abnormality.

Marci Lobel1, Lynette Dias, Bruce A Meyer.   

Abstract

A theoretically-based, multivariate approach was used to identify factors associated with emotional distress for pregnant women undergoing maternal serum alpha fetoprotein (MSAFP or AFP) testing, used to detect abnormalities of the fetal brain and spinal cord. Participants were those who received normal results (N = 87). Study results supported the hypothesis that different factors would predict distress before and after testing. Satisfaction with information about testing predicted lower emotional distress early in the testing process; concerns about the child having other medical conditions and low-dispositional optimism predicted distress later. Study findings indicate that even in women who receive normal test results, AFP testing is associated with a modest degree of emotional disturbance which declines, but does not completely abate, after testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887877     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-005-2564-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  51 in total

Review 1.  Maternal serum screening for fetal genetic disorders.

Authors:  H L Ross; S Elias
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis.

Authors:  A Robinson; G P Henry
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  The psychological impact of false positive elevations of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein.

Authors:  B K Burton; R G Dillard; E N Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Participants' reaction to amniocentesis and prenatal genetic studies.

Authors:  S C Finley; P D Varner; P C Vinson; W H Finley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.

Authors:  T M Marteau; J Slack; J Kidd; R W Shaw
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  Prenatal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening for neural tube defects.

Authors:  J N Macri; R R Weiss
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Screening for neural-tube defects and maternal anxiety.

Authors:  J Fearn; B M Hibbard; K M Laurence; A Roberts; J O Robinson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-03

9.  Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IV. The subjective assessment of probability.

Authors:  S Kessler; E K Levine
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-10

10.  The psychological impact of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: strategies for investigation and intervention.

Authors:  D M Zuskar
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1987
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Levels and associations among self-esteem, fertility distress, coping, and reaction to potentially being a genetic carrier in women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Ceylan Cizmeli; Marci Lobel; Jason Franasiak; Lisa M Pastore
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  A Cross-Sectional Study of the Marital Attitudes of Pregnant Women at Risk for Cystic Fibrosis and Psychological Impact of Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Zoran Laurentiu Popa; Madalin-Marius Margan; Izabella Petre; Elena Bernad; Lavinia Stelea; Veronica Daniela Chiriac; Marius Craina; Ioana Mihaela Ciuca; Anca Mihaela Bina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  The Consequences of a BRCA Mutation in Women.

Authors:  Janice Famorca-Tran; Gayle Roux
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.