Literature DB >> 15879510

Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.

Jesús Fernández1, Beatriz Villanueva, Ricardo Pong-Wong, Miguel Angel Toro.   

Abstract

The value of molecular markers and pedigree records, separately or in combination, to assist in the management of conserved populations has been tested. The general strategy for managing the population was to optimize contributions of parents to the next generation for minimizing the global weighted coancestry. Strategies differed in the type of information used to compute global coancestries, the number and type of evaluated individuals, and the system of mating. Genealogical information proved to be very useful (at least for 10 generations of management) to arrange individuals' contributions via the minimization of global coancestry. In fact, the level of expected heterozygosity after 10 generations yielded by this strategy was 88-100% of the maximum possible improvement obtained if the genotype for all loci was known. Marker information was of very limited value if used alone. The amount and degree of polymorphism of markers to be used to compute molecular coancestry had to be high to mimic the performance of the strategy relying on pedigree, especially in the short term (for example, >10 markers per chromosome with 10 alleles each were needed if only the parents' genotype was available). When both sources of information are combined to calculate the coancestry conditional on markers, clear increases in effective population size (Ne) were found, but observed diversity levels (either gene or allelic diversity) in the early generations were quite similar to the ones obtained with pedigree alone. The advantage of including molecular information is greater when information is available on a greater number of individuals (offspring and parents vs. parents only). However, for realistic situations (i.e., large genomes) the benefits of using information on offspring are small. The same conclusions were reached when comparing the use of the different types of information (genealogical or/and molecular) to perform minimum coancestry matings.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15879510      PMCID: PMC1451183          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.037325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; M A Toro
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Minimization of rate of inbreeding for small populations with overlapping generations.

Authors:  A K Sonesson; T H Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.

Authors:  Anna K Sonesson; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding.

Authors:  A K Sonesson; T H Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers.

Authors:  R Pong-Wong; A W George; J A Woolliams; C S Haley
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  31 in total

1.  An experimental evaluation with Drosophila melanogaster of a novel dynamic system for the management of subdivided populations in conservation programs.

Authors:  V Avila; J Fernández; H Quesada; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Inbreeding rate and genetic structure of cat populations in Poland.

Authors:  S Mucha; A Wolc; A Gradowska; T Szwaczkowski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Jack J Windig; Johan A M van Arendonk; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Estimation of genealogical coancestry in plant species using a pedigree reconstruction algorithm and application to an oil palm breeding population.

Authors:  David Cros; Leopoldo Sánchez; Benoit Cochard; Patrick Samper; Marie Denis; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Jesús Fernández
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Fine-mapping QTLs in advanced intercross lines and other outbred populations.

Authors:  Natalia M Gonzales; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Genetic diversity of Afrikaner cattle in southern Africa.

Authors:  Lené Pienaar; J Paul Grobler; Michiel M Scholtz; Hannelize Swart; Karen Ehlers; Munro Marx; Michael D MacNeil; Frederick W C Neser
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  Molecular and pedigree analysis applied to conservation of animal genetic resources: the case of Brazilian Somali hair sheep.

Authors:  Samuel R Paiva; Olivardo Facó; Danielle A Faria; Thaísa Lacerda; Gabriel B Barretto; Paulo L S Carneiro; Raimundo N B Lobo; Concepta McManus
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Origin, demographics, inbreeding, phylogenetics, and phenogenetics of Karamaniko breed, a major common ancestor of the autochthonous Greek sheep.

Authors:  Ioannis A Giantsis; Danai Antonopoulou; Nikolaos Dekolis; Konstantinos Zaralis; Melpomeni Avdi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.559

10.  Genetic structure and gene flows within horses: a genealogical study at the french population scale.

Authors:  Pauline Pirault; Sophy Danvy; Etienne Verrier; Grégoire Leroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.