Literature DB >> 20823908

An experimental evaluation with Drosophila melanogaster of a novel dynamic system for the management of subdivided populations in conservation programs.

V Avila1, J Fernández, H Quesada, A Caballero.   

Abstract

A dynamic method (DM) recently proposed for the management of captive subdivided populations was evaluated using the pilot species Drosophila melanogaster. By accounting for the particular genetic population structure, the DM determines the optimal mating pairs, their contributions to progeny and the migration pattern that minimize the overall co-ancestry in the population with a control of inbreeding levels. After a pre-management period such that one of the four subpopulations had higher inbreeding and differentiation than the others, three management methods were compared for 10 generations over three replicates: (1) isolated subpopulations (IS), (2) one-migrant-per-generation rule (OMPG), (3) DM aimed to produce the same or lower inbreeding coefficient than OMPG. The DM produced the lowest co-ancestry and equal or lower inbreeding than the OMPG method throughout the experiment. The initially lower fitness and lower variation for nine microsatellite loci of the highly inbred subpopulation were restored more quickly with the DM than with the OMPG method. We provide, therefore, an empirical illustration of the usefulness of the DM as a conservation protocol for captive subdivided populations when pedigree information is available (or can be deduced) and manipulation of breeding pairs is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20823908      PMCID: PMC3186228          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  13 in total

1.  Microsatellite variability differs between dinucleotide repeat motifs-evidence from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Bachtrog; M Agis; M Imhof; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An analysis of genetic differentiation among assortatively mating Drosophila melanogaster in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  M O Kauer; C Schlötterer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.

Authors:  Jesús Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Angel Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs.

Authors:  María Saura; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Jesús Fernández; Miguel A Toro; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Long microsatellite alleles in Drosophila melanogaster have a downward mutation bias and short persistence times, which cause their genome-wide underrepresentation.

Authors:  B Harr; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding.

Authors:  A K Sonesson; T H Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Catalog of Proteins Expressed in the AG Secreted Fluid during the Mature Phase of the Chinese Mitten Crabs (Eriocheir sinensis).

Authors:  Lin He; Qing Li; Lihua Liu; Yuanli Wang; Jing Xie; Hongdan Yang; Qun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.