Literature DB >> 11929623

Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.

Anna K Sonesson1, Theo H E Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Minimum coancestry mating with a maximum of one offspring per mating pair (MC1) is compared with random mating schemes for populations with overlapping generations. Optimum contribution selection is used, whereby DeltaF is restricted. For schemes with DeltaF restricted to 0.25% per year, 256 animals born per year and heritability of 0.25, genetic gain increased with 18% compared with random mating. The effect of MC1 on genetic gain decreased for larger schemes and schemes with a less stringent restriction on inbreeding. Breeding schemes hardly changed when omitting the iteration on the generation interval to find an optimum distribution of parents over age-classes, which saves computer time, but inbreeding and genetic merit fluctuated more before the schemes had reached a steady-state. When bulls were progeny tested, these progeny tested bulls were selected instead of the young bulls, which led to increased generation intervals, increased selection intensity of bulls and increased genetic gain (35% compared to a scheme without progeny testing for random mating). The effect of MC1 decreased for schemes with progeny testing. MC1 mating increased genetic gain from 11-18% for overlapping and 1-4% for discrete generations, when comparing schemes with similar genetic gain and size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929623      PMCID: PMC2705421          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-34-1-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  6 in total

1.  Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.

Authors:  Jesús Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Angel Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Optimized diffusion of buck semen for saving genetic variability in selected dairy goat populations.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Colleau; Virginie Clément; Pierre Martin; Isabelle Palhière
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.

Authors:  Kahsay G Nirea; Anna K Sonesson; John A Woolliams; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.

Authors:  Isabel Cervantes; Juan Pablo Gutiérrez; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Diego Bersabé; Armando Caballero; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.