Literature DB >> 11157003

Optimal marker-assisted selection to increase the effective size of small populations.

J Wang1.   

Abstract

An approach to the optimal utilization of marker and pedigree information in minimizing the rates of inbreeding and genetic drift at the average locus of the genome (not just the marked loci) in a small diploid population is proposed, and its efficiency is investigated by stochastic simulations. The approach is based on estimating the expected pedigree of each chromosome by using marker and individual pedigree information and minimizing the average coancestry of selected chromosomes by quadratic integer programming. It is shown that the approach is much more effective and much less computer demanding in implementation than previous ones. For pigs with 10 offspring per mother genotyped for two markers (each with four alleles at equal initial frequency) per chromosome of 100 cM, the approach can increase the average effective size for the whole genome by approximately 40 and 55% if mating ratios (the number of females mated with a male) are 3 and 12, respectively, compared with the corresponding values obtained by optimizing between-family selection using pedigree information only. The efficiency of the marker-assisted selection method increases with increasing amount of marker information (number of markers per chromosome, heterozygosity per marker) and family size, but decreases with increasing genome size. For less prolific species, the approach is still effective if the mating ratio is large so that a high marker-assisted selection pressure on the rarer sex can be maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157003      PMCID: PMC1461534     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

1.  Marker-assisted selection to increase effective population size by reducing Mendelian segregation variance.

Authors:  J Wang; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; M A Toro
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.

Authors:  A Nejati-Javaremi; C Smith; J P Gibson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Conservation genetics.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Developments in the prediction of effective population size.

Authors:  A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.821

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sánchez; Piter Bijma; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.

Authors:  Jesús Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Angel Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.

Authors:  Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 6.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.