Literature DB >> 14736390

Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding.

A K Sonesson1, T H Meuwissen.   

Abstract

The effect of non-random mating on genetic response was compared for populations with discrete generations. Mating followed a selection step where the average coancestry of selected animals was constrained, while genetic response was maximised. Minimum coancestry (MC), Minimum coancestry with a maximum of one offspring per mating pair (MC1) and Minimum variance of the relationships of offspring (MVRO) mating schemes resulted in a delay in inbreeding of about two generations compared with Random, Random factorial and Compensatory mating. In these breeding schemes where selection constrains the rate of inbreeding, DeltaF, the improved family structure due to non-random mating increased genetic response. For schemes with DeltaF constrained to 1.0% and 100 selection candidates, genetic response was 22% higher for the MC1 and MVRO schemes compared with Random mating schemes. For schemes with a less stringent constraint on DeltaF or more selection candidates, the superiority of the MC1 and MVRO schemes was smaller (5-6% ). In general, MC1 seemed to be the preferred mating method, since it almost always yielded the highest genetic response. MC1 mainly achieved these high genetic responses by avoiding extreme relationships among the offspring, i.e. fullsib offspring are avoided, and by making the contributions of ancestors to offspring more equal by mating least related animals.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 14736390      PMCID: PMC2706885          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-32-3-231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  19 in total

1.  Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Impact of nonrandom mating on genetic variance and gene flow in populations with mass selection.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sánchez; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An experimental evaluation with Drosophila melanogaster of a novel dynamic system for the management of subdivided populations in conservation programs.

Authors:  V Avila; J Fernández; H Quesada; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.

Authors:  Jesús Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Angel Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Optimized diffusion of buck semen for saving genetic variability in selected dairy goat populations.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Colleau; Virginie Clément; Pierre Martin; Isabelle Palhière
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.

Authors:  Kahsay G Nirea; Anna K Sonesson; John A Woolliams; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Breeding Strategies to Optimize Effective Population Size in Low Census Captive Populations: The Case of Gazella cuvieri.

Authors:  Candela Ojeda-Marín; Isabel Cervantes; Eulalia Moreno; Félix Goyache; Juan Pablo Gutiérrez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Strategies for implementing genomic selection in family-based aquaculture breeding schemes: double haploid sib test populations.

Authors:  Kahsay G Nirea; Anna K Sonesson; John A Woolliams; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A mating method accounting for inbreeding and multi-trait selection in dairy cattle populations.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Colleau; Kevin Tual; Hervé de Preaumont; Didier Regaldo
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.