Literature DB >> 24906874

Fine-mapping QTLs in advanced intercross lines and other outbred populations.

Natalia M Gonzales1, Abraham A Palmer.   

Abstract

Quantitative genetic studies in model organisms, particularly in mice, have been extremely successful in identifying chromosomal regions that are associated with a wide variety of behavioral and other traits. However, it is now widely understood that identification of the underlying genes will be far more challenging. In the last few years, a variety of populations have been utilized in an effort to more finely map these chromosomal regions with the goal of identifying specific genes. The common property of these newer populations is that linkage disequilibrium spans relatively short distances, which permits fine-scale mapping resolution. This review focuses on advanced intercross lines (AILs) which are the simplest such population. As originally proposed in 1995 by Darvasi and Soller, an AIL is the product of intercrossing two inbred strains beyond the F2 generation. Unlike recombinant inbred strains, AILs are maintained as outbred populations; brother-sister matings are specifically avoided. Each generation of intercrossing beyond the F2 further degrades linkage disequilibrium between adjacent makers, which allows for fine-scale mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Advances in genotyping technology and techniques for the statistical analysis of AILs have permitted rapid advances in the application of AILs. We review some of the analytical issues and available software, including QTLRel, EMMA, EMMAX, GEMMA, TASSEL, GRAMMAR, WOMBAT, Mendel, and others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24906874      PMCID: PMC4126234          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-014-9523-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  174 in total

1.  Quantitative-trait homozygosity and association mapping and empirical genomewide significance in large, complex pedigrees: fasting serum-insulin level in the Hutterites.

Authors:  Mark Abney; Carole Ober; Mary Sara McPeek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Using advanced intercross lines for high-resolution mapping of HDL cholesterol quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Xiaosong Wang; Isabelle Le Roy; Edwige Nicodeme; Renhua Li; Richard Wagner; Christina Petros; Gary A Churchill; Stephen Harris; Ariel Darvasi; Jorge Kirilovsky; Pierre L Roubertoux; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors.

Authors:  Andrew K Benson; Scott A Kelly; Ryan Legge; Fangrui Ma; Soo Jen Low; Jaehyoung Kim; Min Zhang; Phaik Lyn Oh; Derrick Nehrenberg; Kunjie Hua; Stephen D Kachman; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jens Walter; Daniel A Peterson; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Expression of carnitine palmitoyl-CoA transferase-1B is influenced by a cis-acting eQTL in two chicken lines selected for high and low body weight.

Authors:  Sojeong Ka; Ellen Markljung; Henrik Ring; Frank W Albert; Mohammad Harun-Or-Rashid; Per Wahlberg; Pablo M Garcia-Roves; Juleen R Zierath; D Michael Denbow; Svante Pääbo; Paul B Siegel; Leif Andersson; Finn Hallböök
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Region-based association analysis of human quantitative traits in related individuals.

Authors:  Nadezhda M Belonogova; Gulnara R Svishcheva; Cornelia M van Duijn; Yurii S Aulchenko; Tatiana I Axenovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines.

Authors:  Susanna Atwell; Yu S Huang; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Glenda Willems; Matthew Horton; Yan Li; Dazhe Meng; Alexander Platt; Aaron M Tarone; Tina T Hu; Rong Jiang; N Wayan Muliyati; Xu Zhang; Muhammad Ali Amer; Ivan Baxter; Benjamin Brachi; Joanne Chory; Caroline Dean; Marilyne Debieu; Juliette de Meaux; Joseph R Ecker; Nathalie Faure; Joel M Kniskern; Jonathan D G Jones; Todd Michael; Adnane Nemri; Fabrice Roux; David E Salt; Chunlao Tang; Marco Todesco; M Brian Traw; Detlef Weigel; Paul Marjoram; Justin O Borevitz; Joy Bergelson; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species.

Authors:  Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Qi Sun; Jesse A Poland; Ken Kawamoto; Edward S Buckler; Sharon E Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mapping genetic variants associated with beta-adrenergic responses in inbred mice.

Authors:  Micha Hersch; Bastian Peter; Hyun Min Kang; Fanny Schüpfer; Hugues Abriel; Thierry Pedrazzini; Eleazar Eskin; Jacques S Beckmann; Sven Bergmann; Fabienne Maurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice.

Authors:  Jeremy L Peirce; Lu Lu; Jing Gu; Lee M Silver; Robert W Williams
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of aging bone.

Authors:  Douglas J Adams; David W Rowe; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Informatics resources for the Collaborative Cross and related mouse populations.

Authors:  Andrew P Morgan; Catherine E Welsh
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Transgenerational cardiology: One way to a baby's heart is through the mother.

Authors:  Patrick Y Jay; Ehiole Akhirome; Rachel A Magnan; M Rebecca Zhang; Lillian Kang; Yidan Qin; Nelson Ugwu; Suk Dev Regmi; Julie M Nogee; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  Multi-Omic Approaches to Identify Genetic Factors in Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Karen C Clark; Anne E Kwitek
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.915

Review 5.  Facilitating Complex Trait Analysis via Reduced Complexity Crosses.

Authors:  Camron D Bryant; Desmond J Smith; Kathleen M Kantak; Thaddeus S Nowak; Robert W Williams; M Imad Damaj; Eva E Redei; Hao Chen; Megan K Mulligan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Systems genetics applications in metabolism research.

Authors:  Marcus Seldin; Xia Yang; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2019-10-21

Review 7.  Using Heterogeneous Stocks for Fine-Mapping Genetically Complex Traits.

Authors:  Leah C Solberg Woods; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 8.  Identifying genes for neurobehavioural traits in rodents: progress and pitfalls.

Authors:  Amelie Baud; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.758

9.  Genome wide association analysis in a mouse advanced intercross line.

Authors:  Natalia M Gonzales; Jungkyun Seo; Ana I Hernandez Cordero; Celine L St Pierre; Jennifer S Gregory; Margaret G Distler; Mark Abney; Stefan Canzar; Arimantas Lionikas; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A platform for experimental precision medicine: The extended BXD mouse family.

Authors:  David G Ashbrook; Danny Arends; Pjotr Prins; Megan K Mulligan; Suheeta Roy; Evan G Williams; Cathleen M Lutz; Alicia Valenzuela; Casey J Bohl; Jesse F Ingels; Melinda S McCarty; Arthur G Centeno; Reinmar Hager; Johan Auwerx; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.