Literature DB >> 15875980

It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: on the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition.

Cynthia M Connine1.   

Abstract

Recognition of a frequently heard spoken word variant in American English (flapping) was investigated in a phoneme identification experiment. Listeners identified the initial segment (b or p) of word-nonword continua (e.g., pretty-bretty) that was embedded in either a flap or a [t] variant carrier word (e.g., preDy-breDy or preTTy-breTTy). The results showed more identification responses forming a real word when the to-be-identified speech sound occurred in the more frequently experienced flap carrier. These results support the claim that lexical representation of spoken words includes the flap variant. Listeners do not recode the flap variant into an underlying /t/ version but recognize the flap, in its surface form, via a preexisting representation in lexical memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875980     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: schwa vowel deletion.

Authors:  Paul C LoCasto; Cynthia M Connine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

3.  Variant frequency in flap production. A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production.

Authors:  D Patterson; C M Connine
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Louisa M Slowiaczek; Emily G Soltano; Shani J Wieting; Karyn L Bishop
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-02

5.  A contingent speech technique in eye movement research on reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Cynthia Connine; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-11

6.  Representation of lexical form.

Authors:  Conor T McLennan; Paul A Luce; Jan Charles-Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Cynthia Connie; Brianna Eiter; Ralph Radach; Dieter Heller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Auditory word recognition: extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency.

Authors:  C M Connine; D Titone; J Wang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual recovery from consonant-cluster simplification in Korean using language-specific phonological knowledge.

Authors:  Taehong Cho; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-08

3.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; Laura Dilley; Michael Tat
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07

5.  Perceptual learning of co-articulation in speech.

Authors:  Cynthia M Connine; Laura M Darnieder
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  A Collection of Pseudo-Words to Study Multi-Talker Speech Intelligibility without Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.