Literature DB >> 20161243

How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words.

Mark A Pitt1.   

Abstract

One account of how pronunciation variants of spoken words (center-> "senner" or "sennah") are recognized is that sublexical processes use information about variation in the same phonological environments to recover the intended segments (Gaskell & Marslen-Wilson, 1998). The present study tests the limits of this phonological inference account by examining how listeners process for the first time a pronunciation variant of a newly learned word. Recognition of such a variant should occur as long as it possesses the phonological structure that legitimizes the variation. Experiments 1 and 2 identify a phonological environment that satisfies the conditions necessary for a phonological inference mechanism to be operational. Using a word-learning paradigm, Experiments 3 through 5 show that inference alone is not sufficient for generalization but could facilitate it, and that one condition that leads to generalization is meaningful exposure to the variant in an overheard conversation, demonstrating that lexical processing is necessary for variant recognition.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161243      PMCID: PMC2706522          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  32 in total

1.  Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: schwa vowel deletion.

Authors:  Paul C LoCasto; Cynthia M Connine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

2.  Variant frequency in flap production. A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production.

Authors:  D Patterson; C M Connine
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

4.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Valéria Csépe; Leo Blomert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception.

Authors:  M G Gaskell; W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words.

Authors:  Nicolas Dumay; M Gareth Gaskell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Investigating the Lexical Representation of Mandarin Tone 3 Phonological Alternations.

Authors:  Yu-Fu Chien; Hanbo Yan; Joan A Sereno
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-11-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.