Literature DB >> 15875975

The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.

Mark J Fenske1, Jane E Raymond, Melina A Kunar.   

Abstract

Comparisons of emotional evaluations of abstract stimuli just seen in a two-object visual search task show that prior distractors are devalued, as compared with prior targets or novel items, perhaps as a consequence of persistent attentional inhibition (Raymond, Fenske, & Tavassoli, 2003). To further explore such attention-emotion effects, we measured search response time in a preview search task and emotional evaluations of colorful, complex images just seen therein. On preview trials, the distractors appeared 1,000 msec before the remaining items. On no-preview trials, all the items were presented simultaneously. A single distractor was then rated for its emotional tone. Previewed distractors were consistently devalued, as compared with nonpreviewed distractors, despite longer exposure and being associated with an easier task. This effect was observed only in the participants demonstrating improved search efficiency with preview, but not in others, indicating that the attentional mechanisms underlying the preview benefit have persistent affective consequences in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875975     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  M Donk; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

4.  Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Marvin M Chun; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

Authors:  J D Eastwood; D Smilek; P M Merikle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

6.  Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Marvin M Chun; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks.

Authors:  Mark J Fenske; John D Eastwood
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2003-12

8.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

9.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  D G Amaral; J L Price
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-12-20       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  15 in total

1.  Perception of facial expression depends on prior attention.

Authors:  Julia Gómez-Cuerva; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.

Authors:  Brian A Goolsby; Kimron L Shapiro; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

3.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.

Authors:  Rachel L Driscoll; Keelia Quinn de Launay; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.

Authors:  David De Vito; Anne E Ferrey; Mark J Fenske; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Cognition-emotion interactions are modulated by working memory capacity in individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Bern G Lee; James A Waltz; Benjamin M Robinson; Jaime K Brown; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Attentional modulation of emotional conflict processing with flanker tasks.

Authors:  Pingyan Zhou; Xun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

9.  Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Brian A Goolsby; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Laetitia Silvert; Anna C Nobre; Nickolaos Fragopanagos; John G Taylor; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Response inhibition is linked to emotional devaluation: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Jane E Raymond; Nikki Westoby; Anna C Nobre; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.