Literature DB >> 15871040

Why are young and old repetitive elements distributed differently in the human genome?

Elise M S Belle1, Matthew T Webster, Adam Eyre-Walker.   

Abstract

Alu elements are not distributed homogeneously throughout the human genome: old elements are preferentially found in the GC-rich parts of the genome, while young Alus are more often found in the GC-poor parts of the genome. The process giving rise to this differential distribution remains poorly understood. Here we investigate whether this pattern could be due to a preferential degradation of Alu elements integrated in GC-poor regions by small indel mutations. We aligned 5.1 Mb of human and chimpanzee sequences and examined whether the rate of insertion and deletion inside Alu elements differed according to the base composition surrounding them. We found that Alu elements are not preferentially degraded in GC-poor regions by indel events. We also looked at whether very young L1 elements show the same change in distribution compared to older ones. This analysis indicated that L1 elements also show a shift in their distribution, although we could not assess it as precisely as for Alu elements. We propose that the differential distribution of Alu elements is likely to be due to a change in their pattern of insertion or their probability of fixation through evolutionary time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15871040     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0020-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  29 in total

1.  Similar integration but different stability of Alus and LINEs in the human genome.

Authors:  A Pavlícek; K Jabbari; J Paces; V Paces; J V Hejnar; G Bernardi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-10-03       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Compositional evolution of noncoding DNA in the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Authors:  Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Evidence that nucleotide sequence identity is a requirement for meiotic crossing over within the mouse Eb recombinational hot spot.

Authors:  D B Sant'Angelo; W P Lafuse; H C Passmore
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Integration of retroposable elements in mammals: selection of target sites.

Authors:  J Jurka; P Klonowski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Repair of single-stranded loops in heteroduplex DNA transfected into mammalian cells.

Authors:  U Weiss; J H Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microsatellite evolution inferred from human-chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements.

Authors:  Jeremy S Myers; Bethaney J Vincent; Hunt Udall; W Scott Watkins; Tammy A Morrish; Gail E Kilroy; Gary D Swergold; Jurgen Henke; Lotte Henke; John V Moran; Lynn B Jorde; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences.

Authors:  Marie Dewannieux; Cécile Esnault; Thierry Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  DNA sequence and comparative analysis of chimpanzee chromosome 22.

Authors:  H Watanabe; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; T D Taylor; A Toyoda; Y Kuroki; H Noguchi; A BenKahla; H Lehrach; R Sudbrak; M Kube; S Taenzer; P Galgoczy; M Platzer; M Scharfe; G Nordsiek; H Blöcker; I Hellmann; P Khaitovich; S Pääbo; R Reinhardt; H-J Zheng; X-L Zhang; G-F Zhu; B-F Wang; G Fu; S-X Ren; G-P Zhao; Z Chen; Y-S Lee; J-E Cheong; S-H Choi; K-M Wu; T-T Liu; K-J Hsiao; S-F Tsai; C-G Kim; S OOta; T Kitano; Y Kohara; N Saitou; H-S Park; S-Y Wang; M-L Yaspo; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes.

Authors:  C Daniel Eller; Moira Regelson; Barry Merriman; Stan Nelson; Steve Horvath; York Marahrens
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  The distribution of L1 and Alu retroelements in relation to GC content on human sex chromosomes is consistent with the ectopic recombination model.

Authors:  György Abrusán; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  The (r)evolution of SINE versus LINE distributions in primate genomes: sex chromosomes are important.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Biased distributions and decay of long interspersed nuclear elements in the chicken genome.

Authors:  György Abrusán; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck; Thomas Junier; Joti Giordano; Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Alu and b1 repeats have been selectively retained in the upstream and intronic regions of genes of specific functional classes.

Authors:  Aristotelis Tsirigos; Isidore Rigoutsos
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Alu elements in primates are preferentially lost from areas of high GC content.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hb Hellen; John Fy Brookfield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?

Authors:  Araxi O Urrutia; Leandro Balladares Ocaña; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 13.583

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.