Literature DB >> 9050872

Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons.

J Jurka1.   

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that the reverse-transcribed cellular RNA molecules, called retroposons, integrate at staggered breaks in mammalian chromosomes. However, unlike what was previously thought, most of the staggered breaks are not generated by random nicking. One of the two nicks involved is primarily associated with the 5'-TTAAAA hexanucleotide and its variants derived by a single base substitution, particularly A --> G and T --> C. It is probably generated in the antisense strand between the consensus bases 3'-AA and TTTT complementary to 5'-TTAAAA. The sense strand is nicked at variable distances from the TTAAAA consensus site toward the 3' end, preferably within 15-16 base pairs. The base composition near the second nicking site is also nonrandom at positions preceding the nick. On the basis of the observed sequence patterns it is proposed that integration of mammalian retroposons is mediated by an enzyme with endonucleolytic activity. The best candidate for such enzyme may be the reverse transcriptase encoded by the L1 non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon, which contains a freshly reported domain homologous to the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease family [Martin, F., Olivares, M., Lopez, M. C. & Alonso, C. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 283-285; Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H. & Boeke, J. D. (1996) Cell 87, 905-916] and shows nicking in vitro with preference for targets similar to 5'-TTAAAA/3'-AATTTT consensus sequence [Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H. & Boeke, J. D. (1996) Cell 87, 905-916]. A model for integration of mammalian retroposons based on the presented data is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9050872      PMCID: PMC20010          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

Review 1.  Nonviral retroposons: genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information.

Authors:  A M Weiner; P L Deininger; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  CENSOR--a program for identification and elimination of repetitive elements from DNA sequences.

Authors:  J Jurka; P Klonowski; V Dagman; P Pelton
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  1996-03

3.  Integration site preferences of the Alu family and similar repetitive DNA sequences.

Authors:  G R Daniels; P L Deininger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-12-20       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Multiple aligned sequence editor (MASE).

Authors:  D V Faulkner; J Jurka
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Identification of common molecular subsequences.

Authors:  T F Smith; M S Waterman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-03-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Target sites for the transposition of rat long interspersed repeated DNA elements (LINEs) are not random.

Authors:  A V Furano; C C Somerville; P N Tsichlis; E D'Ambrosio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Capture of retrotransposon DNA at the sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks.

Authors:  J K Moore; J E Haber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Differences in the regulation of messenger RNA for housekeeping and specialized-cell ferritin. A comparison of three distinct ferritin complementary DNAs, the corresponding subunits, and identification of the first processed in amphibia.

Authors:  L F Dickey; S Sreedharan; E C Theil; J R Didsbury; Y H Wang; R E Kaufman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Characterization of a nondeleterious L1 insertion in an intron of the human factor VIII gene and further evidence of open reading frames in functional L1 elements.

Authors:  P Woods-Samuels; C Wong; S L Mathias; A F Scott; H H Kazazian; S E Antonarakis
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Structure of two human beta-actin-related processed genes one of which is located next to a simple repetitive sequence.

Authors:  M Moos; D Gallwitz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  219 in total

1.  Integration of Bombyx mori R2 sequences into the 28S ribosomal RNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D G Eickbush; D D Luan; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Target DNA chromatinization modulates nicking by L1 endonuclease.

Authors:  G J Cost; A Golding; M S Schlissel; J D Boeke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Nucleic acid chaperone activity of the ORF1 protein from the mouse LINE-1 retrotransposon.

Authors:  S L Martin; F D Bushman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  SINE retroposons can be used in vivo as nucleation centers for de novo methylation.

Authors:  P Arnaud; C Goubely; T Pélissier; J M Deragon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Determination of L1 retrotransposition kinetics in cultured cells.

Authors:  E M Ostertag; E T Prak; R J DeBerardinis; J V Moran; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Target sites for SINE integration in Brassica genomes display nuclear matrix binding activity.

Authors:  A P Tikhonov; L Lavie; C Tatout; J L Bennetzen; Z Avramova; J M Deragon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Twin priming: a proposed mechanism for the creation of inversions in L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genomic characterization of recent human LINE-1 insertions: evidence supporting random insertion.

Authors:  I Ovchinnikov; A B Troxel; G D Swergold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Transplantation of target site specificity by swapping the endonuclease domains of two LINEs.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Carène Rizzon; Gabriel Marais; Manolo Gouy; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.