Literature DB >> 8995066

Integration of retroposable elements in mammals: selection of target sites.

J Jurka, P Klonowski.   

Abstract

Genomic DNA fragments generated by the reverse transcription of cellular RNA are called retroposons. Because they are flanked by short repeats, mammalian retroposons are believed to integrate at staggered chromosomal breaks. Recently, a significant sequence pattern associated with the integration of Alu and ID repeats was identified (Jurka 1996). It is represented by the 5' TTAAAA consensus sequence around the 5' ends of flanking repeats of Alu, ID, as well as, of B1 and B2 retroposed elements as shown in this paper. This consensus is a potential target for enzymatic nicking which probably occurs in the complementary strand between 3' AA and the following 3' TTTT bases. The first four bases of the flanking repeats corresponding to the 3' TTTT consensus sequence show some sequence variations that may be affected by complementary base pairing between the A-rich RNA tails and the DNA target sequences prior to nicking and reverse transcription. We discuss potential evidence for such base pairing based on correlated variations in nucleotide composition of different tail and target regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8995066     DOI: 10.1007/bf02202117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  12 in total

Review 1.  Transposing without ends: the non-LTR retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  T H Eickbush
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1992-05

Review 2.  Nonviral retroposons: genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information.

Authors:  A M Weiner; P L Deininger; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Do non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons have nuclease activity?

Authors:  F Martín; M Olivares; M C López; C Alonso
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Microsatellite spreading in the human genome: evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications.

Authors:  E Nadir; H Margalit; T Gallily; S A Ben-Sasson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  CENSOR--a program for identification and elimination of repetitive elements from DNA sequences.

Authors:  J Jurka; P Klonowski; V Dagman; P Pelton
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  1996-03

6.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Integration site preferences of the Alu family and similar repetitive DNA sequences.

Authors:  G R Daniels; P L Deininger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-12-20       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Similarity and divergence among rodent repetitive DNA sequences.

Authors:  W Bains; K Temple-Smith
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Structure of two human beta-actin-related processed genes one of which is located next to a simple repetitive sequence.

Authors:  M Moos; D Gallwitz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  18 in total

1.  An ancient retrovirus-like element contains hot spots for SINE insertion.

Authors:  M A Cantrell; B J Filanoski; A R Ingermann; K Olsson; N DiLuglio; Z Lister; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolutionary implications of multiple SINE insertions in an intronic region from diverse mammals.

Authors:  Li Yu; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Why are young and old repetitive elements distributed differently in the human genome?

Authors:  Elise M S Belle; Matthew T Webster; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Characterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions.

Authors:  Stephen L Gasior; Graeme Preston; Dale J Hedges; Nicolas Gilbert; John V Moran; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  SINE insertions in cladistic analyses and the phylogenetic affiliations of Tarsius bancanus to other primates.

Authors:  J Schmitz; M Ohme; H Zischler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  HIGM syndrome caused by insertion of an AluYb8 element in exon 1 of the CD40LG gene.

Authors:  P A Apoil; E Kuhlein; A Robert; H Rubie; A Blancher
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  Development of crop-specific transposable element (SINE) markers for studying gene flow from oilseed rape to wild radish.

Authors:  J L Prieto; N Pouilly; E Jenczewski; J M Deragon; A M Chèvre
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  A Line 1 insertion in the Factor IX gene segregates with mild hemophilia B in dogs.

Authors:  Marjory B Brooks; Weikuan Gu; Jennifer L Barnas; Jharna Ray; Kunal Ray
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Exon skipping caused by an intronic insertion of a young Alu Yb9 element leads to severe hemophilia A.

Authors:  Arupa Ganguly; Tanya Dunbar; Peiqin Chen; Lynn Godmilow; Tapan Ganguly
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.