Literature DB >> 16955238

The distribution of L1 and Alu retroelements in relation to GC content on human sex chromosomes is consistent with the ectopic recombination model.

György Abrusán1, Hans-Jürgen Krambeck.   

Abstract

The distribution of Alu and L1 retroelements in the human genome changes with their age. Active retroelements target AT-rich regions, but their frequency increases in GC- and gene-rich regions of the genome with increasing age of the insertions. Currently there is no consensus on the mechanism generating this pattern. In this paper we test the hypothesis that selection against deleterious deletions caused by ectopic recombination between repeats is the main cause of the inhomogeneous distribution of L1s and Alus, by means of a detailed analysis of the GC distribution of the repeats on the sex chromosomes. We show that (1) unlike on the autosomes and X chromosome, L1s do not accumulate on the Y chromosome in GC-rich regions, whereas Alus accumulate there to a minor extent; (2) on the Y chromosome Alu and L1 densities are positively correlated, unlike the negative correlation on other chromosomes; and (3) in gene-poor regions of chromosome 4 and X, the distribution of Alus and L1s does not shift toward GC-rich regions. In addition, we show that although local GC content of long L1 insertions is lower than average, their selective loss from recombining chromosomes is not the main cause of the enrichment of ancient L1s in GC-rich regions. The results support the hypothesis that ectopic recombination causes the shift of Alu and L1 distributions toward the gene-rich regions of the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16955238     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-005-0275-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  51 in total

1.  Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: the Lyon repeat hypothesis.

Authors:  J A Bailey; L Carrel; A Chakravarti; E E Eichler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons.

Authors:  S Boissinot; A V Furano
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Similar integration but different stability of Alus and LINEs in the human genome.

Authors:  A Pavlícek; K Jabbari; J Paces; V Paces; J V Hejnar; G Bernardi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-10-03       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Densities, length proportions, and other distributional features of repetitive sequences in the human genome estimated from 430 megabases of genomic sequence.

Authors:  Z Gu; H Wang; A Nekrutenko; W H Li
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-23       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database.

Authors:  D Karolchik; R Baertsch; M Diekhans; T S Furey; A Hinrichs; Y T Lu; K M Roskin; M Schwartz; C W Sugnet; D J Thomas; R J Weber; D Haussler; W J Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Retrotransposition of Alu elements: how many sources?

Authors:  Richard Cordaux; Dale J Hedges; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  The biased distribution of Alus in human isochores might be driven by recombination.

Authors:  Michael Hackenberg; Pedro Bernaola-Galván; Pedro Carpena; José L Oliver
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences.

Authors:  Marie Dewannieux; Cécile Esnault; Thierry Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome.

Authors:  Julien Meunier; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Gender specific differences in levels of DNA methylation at selected loci from human total blood: a tendency toward higher methylation levels in males.

Authors:  Osman El-Maarri; Tim Becker; Judith Junen; Syed Saadi Manzoor; Amalia Diaz-Lacava; Rainer Schwaab; Thomas Wienker; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Exceptional LINE density at V1R loci: the Lyon repeat hypothesis revisited on autosomes.

Authors:  Marijo B Kambere; Robert P Lane
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Translation from nonautonomous type IAP retrotransposon is a critical determinant of transposition activity: implication for retrotransposon-mediated genome evolution.

Authors:  Ei-Suke Saito; Vincent W Keng; Junji Takeda; Kyoji Horie
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The (r)evolution of SINE versus LINE distributions in primate genomes: sex chromosomes are important.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Evolutionary rate of human tissue-specific genes are related with transposable element insertions.

Authors:  Ping Jin; Sheng Qin; Xi Chen; Yumei Song; Jesse Li-Ling; Xiaofeng Xu; Fei Ma
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Alu elements: know the SINEs.

Authors:  Prescott Deininger
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 7.  An expanding universe of the non-coding genome in cancer biology.

Authors:  Bin Xue; Lin He
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Biased distributions and decay of long interspersed nuclear elements in the chicken genome.

Authors:  György Abrusán; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck; Thomas Junier; Joti Giordano; Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Alu repeats increase local recombination rates.

Authors:  David J Witherspoon; W Scott Watkins; Yuhua Zhang; Jinchuan Xing; Whitney L Tolpinrud; Dale J Hedges; Mark A Batzer; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The role of LINEs and CpG islands in dosage compensation on the chicken Z chromosome.

Authors:  Esther Melamed; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.