Literature DB >> 20219940

The (r)evolution of SINE versus LINE distributions in primate genomes: sex chromosomes are important.

Erika M Kvikstad1, Kateryna D Makova.   

Abstract

The densities of transposable elements (TEs) in the human genome display substantial variation both within individual chromosomes and among chromosome types (autosomes and the two sex chromosomes). Finding an explanation for this variability has been challenging, especially in light of genome landscapes unique to the sex chromosomes. Here, using a multiple regression framework, we investigate primate Alu and L1 densities shaped by regional genome features and location on a particular chromosome type. As a result of our analysis, first, we build statistical models explaining up to 79% and 44% of variation in Alu and L1 element density, respectively. Second, we analyze sex chromosome versus autosome TE densities corrected for regional genomic effects. We discover that sex-chromosome bias in Alu and L1 distributions not only persists after accounting for these effects, but even presents differences in patterns, confirming preferential Alu integration in the male germline, yet likely integration of L1s in both male and female germlines or in early embryogenesis. Additionally, our models reveal that local base composition (measured by GC content and density of L1 target sites) and natural selection (inferred via density of most conserved elements) are significant to predicting densities of L1s. Interestingly, measurements of local double-stranded breaks (a 13-mer associated with genome instability) strongly correlate with densities of Alu elements; little evidence was found for the role of recombination-driven deletion in driving TE distributions over evolutionary time. Thus, Alu and L1 densities have been influenced by the combination of distinct local genome landscapes and the unique evolutionary dynamics of sex chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219940      PMCID: PMC2860162          DOI: 10.1101/gr.099044.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  72 in total

1.  Duplication, coclustering, and selection of human Alu retrotransposons.

Authors:  Jerzy Jurka; Oleksiy Kohany; Adam Pavlicek; Vladimir V Kapitonov; Michael V Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons.

Authors:  J Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Natural genetic variation caused by transposable elements in humans.

Authors:  E Andrew Bennett; Laura E Coleman; Circe Tsui; W Stephen Pittard; Scott E Devine
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Ancestral, mammalian-wide subfamilies of LINE-1 repetitive sequences.

Authors:  A F Smit; G Tóth; A D Riggs; J Jurka
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-02-24       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes.

Authors:  Andrew I Su; Tim Wiltshire; Serge Batalov; Hilmar Lapp; Keith A Ching; David Block; Jie Zhang; Richard Soden; Mimi Hayakawa; Gabriel Kreiman; Michael P Cooke; John R Walker; John B Hogenesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Patterns of insertions and their covariation with substitutions in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Authors:  Shan Yang; Arian F Smit; Scott Schwartz; Francesca Chiaromonte; Krishna M Roskin; David Haussler; Webb Miller; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Human cis natural antisense transcripts initiated by transposable elements.

Authors:  Andrew B Conley; Wolfgang J Miller; I King Jordan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database: 2008 update.

Authors:  D Karolchik; R M Kuhn; R Baertsch; G P Barber; H Clawson; M Diekhans; B Giardine; R A Harte; A S Hinrichs; F Hsu; K M Kober; W Miller; J S Pedersen; A Pohl; B J Raney; B Rhead; K R Rosenbloom; K E Smith; M Stanke; A Thakkapallayil; H Trumbower; T Wang; A S Zweig; D Haussler; W J Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A macaque's-eye view of human insertions and deletions: differences in mechanisms.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Endonuclease-independent insertion provides an alternative pathway for L1 retrotransposition in the human genome.

Authors:  Shurjo K Sen; Charles T Huang; Kyudong Han; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Differential chromosomal organization between Saguinus midas and Saguinus bicolor with accumulation of differences the repetitive sequence DNA.

Authors:  Dayane Martins Barbosa Serfaty; Natália Dayane Moura Carvalho; Maria Claudia Gross; Marcelo Gordo; Carlos Henrique Schneider
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Genomic landscape of human, bat, and ex vivo DNA transposon integrations.

Authors:  Rebeca Campos-Sánchez; Aurélie Kapusta; Cédric Feschotte; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Families of transposable elements, population structure and the origin of species.

Authors:  Jerzy Jurka; Weidong Bao; Kenji K Kojima
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Human L1 Transposition Dynamics Unraveled with Functional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Di Chen; Marzia A Cremona; Zongtai Qi; Robi D Mitra; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome.

Authors:  Kateryna D Makova; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits.

Authors:  Edward B Chuong; Nels C Elde; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  An expanding universe of the non-coding genome in cancer biology.

Authors:  Bin Xue; Lin He
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  The role of 3D genome organization in disease: From compartments to single nucleotides.

Authors:  Abhijit Chakraborty; Ferhat Ay
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 7.727

10.  Natural antisense transcription from a comparative perspective.

Authors:  Monica J Piatek; Victoria Henderson; Hany S Zynad; Andreas Werner
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.