Literature DB >> 11591470

Similar integration but different stability of Alus and LINEs in the human genome.

A Pavlícek1, K Jabbari, J Paces, V Paces, J V Hejnar, G Bernardi.   

Abstract

Alus and LINEs (LINE1) are widespread classes of repeats that are very unevenly distributed in the human genome. The majority of GC-poor LINEs reside in the GC-poor isochores whereas GC-rich Alus are mostly present in GC-rich isochores. The discovery that LINES and Alus share similar target site duplication and a common AT-rich insertion site specificity raised the question as to why these two families of repeats show such a different distribution in the genome. This problem was investigated here by studying the isochore distributions of subfamilies of LINES and Alus characterized by different degrees of divergence from the consensus sequences, and of Alus, LINEs and pseudogenes located on chromosomes 21 and 22. Young Alus are more frequent in the GC-poor part of the genome than old Alus. This suggests that the gradual accumulation of Alus in GC-rich isochores has occurred because of their higher stability in compositionally matching chromosomal regions. Densities of Alus and LINEs increase and decrease, respectively, with increasing GC levels, except for the telomeric regions of the analyzed chromosomes. In addition to LINEs, processed pseudogenes are also more frequent in GC-poor isochores. Finally, the present results on Alu and LINE stability/exclusion predict significant losses of Alu DNA from the GC-poor isochores during evolution, a phenomenon apparently due to negative selection against sequences that differ from the isochore composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591470     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00645-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  43 in total

1.  Processed pseudogenes of human endogenous retroviruses generated by LINEs: their integration, stability, and distribution.

Authors:  Adam Pavlícek; Jan Paces; Daniel Elleder; Jirí Hejnar
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Millions of years of evolution preserved: a comprehensive catalog of the processed pseudogenes in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhaolei Zhang; Paul M Harrison; Yin Liu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Duplication, coclustering, and selection of human Alu retrotransposons.

Authors:  Jerzy Jurka; Oleksiy Kohany; Adam Pavlicek; Vladimir V Kapitonov; Michael V Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Retroelement distributions in the human genome: variations associated with age and proximity to genes.

Authors:  Patrik Medstrand; Louie N van de Lagemaat; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Identification and analysis of over 2000 ribosomal protein pseudogenes in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhaolei Zhang; Paul Harrison; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  High concentrations of long interspersed nuclear element sequence distinguish monoallelically expressed genes.

Authors:  Elena Allen; Steve Horvath; Frances Tong; Peter Kraft; Elizabeth Spiteri; Arthur D Riggs; York Marahrens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The biased distribution of Alus in human isochores might be driven by recombination.

Authors:  Michael Hackenberg; Pedro Bernaola-Galván; Pedro Carpena; José L Oliver
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Why are young and old repetitive elements distributed differently in the human genome?

Authors:  Elise M S Belle; Matthew T Webster; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes.

Authors:  C Daniel Eller; Moira Regelson; Barry Merriman; Stan Nelson; Steve Horvath; York Marahrens
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Human chromosomal bands: nested structure, high-definition map and molecular basis.

Authors:  Maria Costantini; Oliver Clay; Concetta Federico; Salvatore Saccone; Fabio Auletta; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.