Literature DB >> 16708219

Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.

Yoshihisa Hatakeyama1, Shingo Kakeda, Yukunori Korogi, Norihiro Ohnari, Junji Moriya, Nobuhiro Oda, Kazuyoshi Nishino, Wataru Miyamoto.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between a flat panel detector (FPD) of the direct conversion type with low radiation dose and a conventional image intensifier (I.I.)-TV system, and to assess 3D DSA with the FPD system in the depiction of intracranial vessels. Fifteen consecutive patients (five men, ten women; age range: 18-82 years; mean age: 55.5 years) were prospectively included in this study. All patients underwent 2D DSA with both the FPD and I.I.-TV system in one projection. The radiation doses during angiography were evaluated using a phantom. The 3D DSA images were created from the rotational DSA data with the FPD system. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated 2D DSA with the FPD system and I.I.-TV system using a 5-point assessment scale (excellent to not visible) to assess the depiction of intracranial vessels. MIP and volume rendering (VR) images of 3D DSA with the FPD system were also evaluated using a 5-point scale (excellent to not visible). DSA and fluoroscopy dose measurements with the phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 85% and 9% with the FPD system compared with the I.I.-TV system, respectively. For 2D DSA, the FPD system was significantly superior to the I.I.-TV system with respect to the visibility of the peripheral and perforating vessels (p<0.05). The peripheral and perforating vessels were also sufficiently visualized on MIP images of 3D DSA in all 15 cases. Our FPD system was found to be superior to the I.I.-TV system in visualizing small intracranial vessels combined with a significant reduction of radiation dose, and was able to create high-quality 3D DSA images on which high spatial resolution allowed precise visualization of small vessels such as perforating ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708219     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0233-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  18 in total

Review 1.  Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.

Authors:  H G Chotas; J T Dobbins; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications.

Authors:  P R Granfors; R Aufrichtig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges.

Authors:  A Noel; F Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography.

Authors:  J A Rowlands; D M Hunter; N Araj
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.

Authors:  Michael Strotzer; Markus Völk; Rüdiger Fründ; Okka Hamer; Niels Zorger; Stefan Feuerbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.

Authors:  Ulrike Rapp-Bernhardt; Friedrich W Roehl; Robert C Gibbs; Hagen Schmidl; Ulrich W Krause; Thomas M Bernhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Takeshi Sugahara; Yukunori Korogi; Kouji Nakashima; Satoshi Hamatake; Shin Honda; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview.

Authors:  Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  3D angiography. Clinical interest. First applications in interventional neuroradiology.

Authors:  R Anxionnat; S Bracard; J Macho; E Da Costa; R Vaillant; L Launay; Y Trousset; R Romeas; L Picard
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.447

10.  Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Kenji Suginohara; Ken Ono; Tomohiro Nishi; Shozaburo Uemura; Masayuki Yamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances in interventional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Vallabh Janardhan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT.

Authors:  M Doelken; T Struffert; G Richter; T Engelhorn; C Nimsky; O Ganslandt; T Hammen; A Doerfler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  GPU based parallel acceleration for fast C-arm cone-beam CT reconstruction.

Authors:  Ken Chen; Cheng Wang; Jing Xiong; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.819

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.