Literature DB >> 15842009

The distinctness of speakers' /s/-/S/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect.

Joseph S Perkell1, Melanie L Matthies, Mark Tiede, Harlan Lane, Majid Zandipour, Nicole Marrone, Ellen Stockmann, Frank H Guenther.   

Abstract

This study examines individual differences in producing the sibilant contrast in American English and the relation of those differences to 2 speaker characteristics: (a) use of a quantal biomechanical effect (called a "saturation effect") in producing the sibilants and (b) performance on a test of sibilant discrimination. Twenty participants produced the sibilants /s/ and /S/ in normal-, clear-, and fast-speaking conditions. The degree to which the participants used a saturation effect in producing /s/ and /S/ was assessed with a custom-made sensor that measured contact of the underside of the tongue tip with the lower alveolar ridge; such contact normally occurs during the production of /s/ but not /S/. The acuteness of the participants' discrimination of the sibilant contrast was measured using the ABX paradigm and synthesized sibilants. Differences among speakers in the degree of acoustic contrast between /s/ and /S/ that they produced proved related to differences among them in their use of contact contrastively and in their discriminative performance. The most distinct sibilant productions were obtained from participants who used contact in producing /s/ but not /S/ and who had high discrimination scores. The participants who did not use contact differentially when producing the 2 sibilants and who also discriminated the synthetic sibilants less well produced the least distinct sibilant contrasts. Intermediate degrees of sibilant contrast were found with participants who used contact differentially or discriminated well. These findings are compatible with a model of speech motor planning in which goals for phonemic speech movements are in somatosensory and auditory spaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15842009     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/095)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  30 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Evaluating the spectral distinction between sibilant fricatives through a speaker-centered approach.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Elizabeth Seelinger; Kerry Callahan Mandulak; David J Zajac
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 3.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production.

Authors:  Frank H Guenther; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; David J Ostry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fine-grained variation in caregivers' /s/ predicts their infants' /s/ category.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?

Authors:  Adam Klaus; Daniel R Lametti; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Quantal biomechanical effects in speech postures of the lips.

Authors:  Bryan Gick; Connor Mayer; Chenhao Chiu; Erik Widing; François Roewer-Després; Sidney Fels; Ian Stavness
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.