Literature DB >> 32727259

Quantal biomechanical effects in speech postures of the lips.

Bryan Gick1, Connor Mayer2, Chenhao Chiu3, Erik Widing4, François Roewer-Després4, Sidney Fels5, Ian Stavness4.   

Abstract

The unique biomechanical and functional constraints on human speech make it a promising area for research investigating modular control of movement. The present article illustrates how a modular control approach to speech can provide insights relevant to understanding both motor control and observed variation across languages. We specifically explore the robust typological finding that languages produce different degrees of labial constriction using distinct muscle groupings and concomitantly distinct lip postures. Research has suggested that these lip postures exploit biomechanical regions of nonlinearity between neural activation and movement, also known as quantal regions, to allow movement goals to be realized despite variable activation signals. We present two sets of computer simulations showing that these labial postures can be generated under the assumption of modular control and that the corresponding modules are biomechanically robust: first to variation in the activation levels of participating muscles, and second to interference from surrounding muscles. These results provide support for the hypothesis that biomechanical robustness is an important factor in selecting the muscle groupings used for speech movements and provide insight into the neurological control of speech movements and how biomechanical and functional constraints govern the emergence of speech motor modules. We anticipate that future experimental work guided by biomechanical simulation results will provide new insights into the neural organization of speech movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article provides additional evidence that speech motor control is organized in a modular fashion and that biomechanics constrain the kinds of motor modules that may emerge. It also suggests that speech can be a fruitful domain for the study of modularity and that a better understanding of speech motor modules will be useful for speech research. Finally, it suggests that biomechanical modeling can serve as a useful complement to experimental work when studying modularity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical simulation; motor control; phonetics; quantal effects; speech

Year:  2020        PMID: 32727259      PMCID: PMC7509306          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00676.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

Review 1.  Coordination and localization in spinal motor systems.

Authors:  Matthew C Tresch; Philippe Saltiel; Andrea d'Avella; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-10

2.  Muscle coordination is habitual rather than optimal.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Gerald E Loeb; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Simulation of dynamic orofacial movements using a constitutive law varying with muscle activation.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nazari; Pascal Perrier; Matthieu Chabanas; Yohan Payan
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii.

Authors:  Silvia S Blemker; Peter M Pinsky; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Spatio-temporal articulatory movement primitives during speech production: extraction, interpretation, and validation.

Authors:  Vikram Ramanarayanan; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Postural hand synergies for tool use.

Authors:  M Santello; M Flanders; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stability of muscle synergies for voluntary actions after cortical stroke in humans.

Authors:  Vincent C K Cheung; Lamberto Piron; Michela Agostini; Stefano Silvoni; Andrea Turolla; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Learning a novel myoelectric-controlled interface task.

Authors:  Saritha M Radhakrishnan; Stuart N Baker; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Force per cross-sectional area from molecules to muscles: a general property of biological motors.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Rospars; Nicole Meyer-Vernet
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.