Literature DB >> 22661828

Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Joseph S Perkell1.   

Abstract

Studies of speech motor control are described that support a theoretical framework in which fundamental control variables for phonemic movements are multi-dimensional regions in auditory and somatosensory spaces. Auditory feedback is used to acquire and maintain auditory goals and in the development and function of feedback and feedforward control mechanisms. Several lines of evidence support the idea that speakers with more acute sensory discrimination acquire more distinct goal regions and therefore produce speech sounds with greater contrast. Feedback modification findings indicate that fluently produced sound sequences are encoded as feedforward commands, and feedback control serves to correct mismatches between expected and produced sensory consequences.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22661828      PMCID: PMC3361736          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  66 in total

1.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  H Lane; J W Webster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Specificity of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tremblay; Guillaume Houle; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A biomechanical model of cardinal vowel production: muscle activations and the impact of gravity on tongue positioning.

Authors:  Stéphanie Buchaillard; Pascal Perrier; Yohan Payan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation.

Authors:  F H Guenther; M N Gjaja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  M L Matthies; M Svirsky; J Perkell; H Lane
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-10

8.  Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: a pilot "motor equivalence" study.

Authors:  J S Perkell; M L Matthies; M A Svirsky; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Lip-larynx coordination in speech: effects of mechanical perturbations to the lower lip.

Authors:  K G Munhall; A Löfqvist; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Gregory S Hickok; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Quantal biomechanical effects in speech postures of the lips.

Authors:  Bryan Gick; Connor Mayer; Chenhao Chiu; Erik Widing; François Roewer-Després; Sidney Fels; Ian Stavness
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation over right somatosensory larynx cortex enhances vocal pitch-regulation in nonsingers.

Authors:  Sebastian Finkel; Ralf Veit; Martin Lotze; Anders Friberg; Peter Vuust; Surjo Soekadar; Niels Birbaumer; Boris Kleber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Redistribution of neural phase coherence reflects establishment of feedforward map in speech motor adaptation.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.