Literature DB >> 30823822

Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?

Adam Klaus1, Daniel R Lametti2, Douglas M Shiller3, Tara McAllister4.   

Abstract

Recent work showing that a period of perceptual training can modulate the magnitude of speech-motor learning in a perturbed auditory feedback task could inform clinical interventions or second-language training strategies. The present study investigated the influence of perceptual training on a clinically and pedagogically relevant task of vocally matching a visually presented speech target using visual-acoustic biofeedback. Forty female adults aged 18-35 yr received perceptual training targeting the English /æ-ɛ/ contrast, randomly assigned to a condition that shifted the perceptual boundary toward either /æ/ or /ɛ/. Participants were then asked to produce the word head while modifying their output to match a visually presented acoustic target corresponding with a slightly higher first formant (F1, closer to /æ/). By analogy to findings from previous research, it was predicted that individuals whose boundary was shifted toward /æ/ would also show a greater magnitude of change in the visual biofeedback task. After perceptual training, the groups showed the predicted difference in perceptual boundary location, but they did not differ in their performance on the biofeedback matching task. It is proposed that the explicit versus implicit nature of the tasks used might account for the difference between this study and previous findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30823822      PMCID: PMC6374144          DOI: 10.1121/1.5089218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Keiichi Tajima; Akiko M Callan; Rieko Kubo; Shinobu Masaki; Reiko Akahane-Yamada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The distinctness of speakers' /s/-/S/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell; Melanie L Matthies; Mark Tiede; Harlan Lane; Majid Zandipour; Nicole Marrone; Ellen Stockmann; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.

Authors:  Virgilio M Villacorta; Joseph S Perkell; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Donald A Robin; Shannon N Austermann Hula; Skott E Freedman; Gabriele Wulf; Kirrie J Ballard; Richard A Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of French [u]: an acoustic and perceptual study of 4-year-old children.

Authors:  Lucie Ménard; Pascal Perrier; Jero Me Aubin; Christophe Savariaux; Mélanie Thibeault
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation.

Authors:  John F Houde; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability.

Authors:  Hung-Shao Cheng; Caroline A Niziolek; Adam Buchwald; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.