Literature DB >> 15828590

On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Glenn S Brown1, K Geoffrey White.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined whether postsample signals of reinforcer probability or magnitude affected the accuracy of delayed matching to sample in pigeons. On each trial, red or green choice responses that matched red or green stimuli seen shortly before a variable retention interval were reinforced with wheat access. In Experiment 1, the reinforcer probability was either 0.2 or 1.0 for both red and green responses. Reinforcer probability was signaled by line or cross symbols that appeared after the sample had been presented. In Experiment 2, all correct responses were reinforced, and the signaled reinforcer durations were 1.0 s and 4.5 s. Matching was more accurate when larger or more probable reinforcers were signaled, independently of retention interval duration. Because signals were presented postsample, the effects were not the result of differential attention to the sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15828590      PMCID: PMC1193742          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.94-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Local proactive interference in delayed matching to sample: the role of reinforcement.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Amy E Parkinson; Glenn S Brown; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.

Authors:  D McCarthy; P Voss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity.

Authors:  D L Brodigan; G B Peterson
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

10.  Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.

Authors:  R E DeLong; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Contrast effects in response rate and accuracy of delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Delayed matching to sample: reinforcement has opposite effects on resistance to change in two related procedures.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum; Ryan Ward
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Tradeoff between manual response speed and pursuit accuracy revealed by a deadline procedure.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Seya; Shuji Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The impact of motivation on cognitive performance in an animal model of the negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Vanessa Winiger; Kerin K Higa; Julia B Kahn; Eric R Kandel; Peter D Balsam; Eleanor H Simpson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Sarah E Hall; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Jason R Croft; Karen L Dugosh; Patricia L Arabia; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.