Literature DB >> 16396078

Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.

Glenn S Brown1, K Geoffrey White.   

Abstract

In two experiments, pigeons' responding on an extraneous task was explicitly reinforced during delayed matching-to-sample trials. In Experiment 1, red or green sample stimuli were followed by retention intervals of 0.2, 1, 4, or 12 sec, during which pecks to a white center key were reinforced with 2.5-sec access to wheat according to extinction, variable-interval 30-sec, and variable-interval 15-sec schedules in different conditions. A proportion of .2, .5, .7, or .9 of subsequent red or green choice responses that matched the sample were reinforced with 3-sec access to wheat. The result was that increasing center key reinforcement, or reducing reinforcer probability, lowered overall accuracy. Initial discriminability fell, but with no change in the rate of forgetting. In Experiment 2, initial discriminability was affected by extraneous reinforcers that were contingent on center key pecking, but not by noncontingent reinforcers. A plausible conclusion is that initial discriminability decreases when reinforcers strengthen competing behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396078     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  28 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Local proactive interference in delayed matching to sample: the role of reinforcement.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Amy E Parkinson; Glenn S Brown; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

3.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effect of delay-interval stimuli on delayed symbolic matching to sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; R J Summers; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effect of delay-interval illumination on matching behavior in the capuchin monkey.

Authors:  M R D'Amato; W O'neill
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

10.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Contrast effects in response rate and accuracy of delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reversing the course of forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Delayed matching to sample: reinforcement has opposite effects on resistance to change in two related procedures.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum; Ryan Ward
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  In search of consolidation of short-term memory in nonhuman animals.

Authors:  Amanda Calder; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.926

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.