Literature DB >> 21765543

Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

K Geoffrey White1, Glenn S Brown.   

Abstract

Pigeons performed a delayed matching-to-sample task in which large or small reinforcers for correct remembering were signaled during the retention interval. Accuracy was low when small reinforcers were signaled, and high when large reinforcers were signaled (the signaled magnitude effect). When the reinforcer-size cue was switched from small to large partway through the retention interval, accuracy accordingly changed from low to high. The opposite happened when the cue was switched from large to small. This dissociation of forgetting from the passage of time raises the possibility that remembering is delay-specific. The reversal of the signaled magnitude effect during the retention interval is consistent with an attentional account in which the stimulus control of remembering is influenced by extraneous events.

Keywords:  delay-specific remembering; delayed matching to sample; delayed stimulus control; forgetting; pigeons; signaled magnitude effect

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21765543      PMCID: PMC3136895          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model.

Authors:  James S Nairne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

4.  The effects of changes in consequences on hens' performance in delayed-matching-to-sample tasks.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Richard J M Etheredge; T Mary Foster; Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

10.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  A delay-specific differential outcomes effect in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Rebecca J Sargisson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.