Literature DB >> 23523782

Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Yusuke Hayashi1, Sarah E Hall, Dean C Williams.   

Abstract

The present study investigated effects of signaled reinforcer magnitude in a delayed identity matching-to-sample procedure. Four individuals with intellectual disabilities were trained on conditional discrimination with three geometric stimuli as sample and comparison stimuli. Retention intervals ranged from 0.1 to 16s. The magnitude of the reinforcer (different durations of access to a video game) was signaled by the background color of the screen. Matching accuracy was overall higher when the larger reinforcer was signaled, independently of retention intervals.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523782      PMCID: PMC3657314          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  14 in total

1.  The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Negative effects of positive reinforcement.

Authors:  Michael Perone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.

Authors:  D McCarthy; P Voss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

8.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

Review 10.  Elucidating the effects of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  M Bonem; E K Crossman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  1 in total

1.  Aversive properties of negative incentive shifts in Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.

Authors:  Adam Brewer; Patrick Johnson; Jeff Stein; Michael Schlund; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.