Literature DB >> 19331486

Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember.

David S Festinger1, Douglas B Marlowe, Jason R Croft, Karen L Dugosh, Patricia L Arabia, Kathleen M Benasutti.   

Abstract

Research participants often fail to recall substantial amounts of informed consent information after delays of only a few days. Numerous interventions have proven effective at improving consent recall; however, virtually all have focused on compensating for potential cognitive deficits and have ignored motivational factors. In this pilot study, the authors randomly assigned 31 drug court clients participating in a clinical research trial to a control group that received a standard informed consent procedure or to a group that received the same procedure plus incentives for correctly recalling consent information. The incentive group was told they would receive $5 for each of the 15 consent items they could answer correctly 1 week later. At the follow-up, the incentive group recalled a significantly greater percentage of consent information overall than the control group (65% vs. 42%, p<.01). Findings from this study have important implications for the ethical conduct of human subject research. The incentivized consent procedure may be useful for improving consent recall in research studies, particularly those involving potentially serious side effects. The results also provide an important "proof of concept" regarding the utility of motivational procedures for improving recall of consent information. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19331486      PMCID: PMC3218798          DOI: 10.1037/a0015421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  11 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent in clinical trials.

Authors:  F W Verheggen; F C van Wijmen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation?

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Jason R Croft; Karen L Dugosh; Nicole K Mastro; Patricia A Lee; David S Dematteo; Nicholas S Patapis
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Does size matter? Salience of follow-up payments in drug abuse research.

Authors:  Jason R Croft; David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Douglas B Marlowe; Beth J Rosenwasser
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

6.  Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.

Authors:  E Bjørn; P Rossel; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; E Visser-Pol; G H Leenhouts; M J Muller; A C van der Schot; F S van Dam; R B Keus; C C Koning; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; J A van Dongen; R Dubbelman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness.

Authors:  P G Stiles; N G Poythress; A Hall; D Falkenbach; R Williams
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 9.  Informed consent for clinical trials: in search of the "best" method.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Thornton; J Hewison
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Informed consent for research. Effects of readability, patient age, and education.

Authors:  H A Taub; M T Baker; J F Sturr
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  13 in total

1.  Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision.

Authors:  Ashleigh A Allen; Donna T Chen; Richard J Bonnie; Tomohiro M Ko; Colleen E Suratt; Joshua D Lee; Peter D Friedmann; Michael Gordon; Ryan McDonald; Sean M Murphy; Tamara Y Boney; Edward V Nunes; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research among Substance Abusing Offenders.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Jason R Croft; Patricia L Arabia; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-01-01

3.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.

Authors:  Jordan P Davis; Emily A Lux; Douglas C Smith; Leah Cleeland
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

7.  Contingency management for cocaine treatment: cash vs. vouchers.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Kimberly C Kirby; Brittany L Seymour
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-03-06

8.  Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Douglas B Marlowe; Nicolle T Clements
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  How should debriefing be undertaken in web-based studies? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Amanda Wilson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Framing a Consent Form to Improve Consent Understanding and Determine How This Affects Willingness to Participate in HIV Cure Research: An Experimental Survey Study.

Authors:  John A Sauceda; Karine Dubé; Brandon Brown; Ashley E Pérez; Catherine E Rivas; David Evans; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 1.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.