Literature DB >> 10842380

Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement.

M H Wholey1, M Wholey, K Mathias, G S Roubin, E B Diethrich, M Henry, S Bailey, P Bergeron, G Dorros, G Eles, P Gaines, C R Gomez, B Gray, J Guimaraens, R Higashida, D S Ho, B Katzen, A Kambara, V Kumar, J C Laborde, M Leon, M Lim, H Londero, J Mesa, A Musacchio, S Myla, S Ramee, A Rodriquez, K Rosenfield, N Sakai, F Shawl, H Sievert, G Teitelbaum, J G Theron, P Vaclav, C Vozzi, J S Yadav, S I Yoshimura.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review and update the current status of carotid artery stent placement in the world. Surveys to major interventional centers in Europe, North and South America, and Asia were initially completed in June 1997. Subsequent information from these 24 centers in addition to 12 new centers has been obtained to update the information. The survey asked the various questions regarding the patients enrolled, procedure techniques, and results of carotid stenting, including complications and restenosis. The total number of endovascular carotid stent procedures that have been performed worldwide to date included 5,210 procedures involving 4,757 patients. There was a technical success of 98.4% with 5,129 carotid arteries treated. Complications that occurred during the carotid stent placement or within a 30-day period following placement were recorded. Overall, there were 134 transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) for a rate of 2.82%. Based on the total patient population, there were 129 minor strokes with a rate of occurrence of 2.72%. The total number of major strokes was 71 for a rate of 1.49%. There were 41 deaths within a 30-day postprocedure period resulting in a mortality rate of 0.86%. The combined minor and major strokes and procedure-related death rate was 5.07%. Restenosis rates of carotid stenting have been 1.99% and 3.46% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The rate of neurologic events after stent placement has been 1.42% at 6-12-month follow-up. Endovascular stent treatment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is growing as an alternative for vascular surgery, especially for patients that are high risk for standard carotid endarterectomy. The periprocedure risks for major and minor strokes and death are generally acceptable at this early stage of development and have not changed significantly since the first survey results. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 50:160-167, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842380     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200006)50:2<160::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  65 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain.

Authors:  H J Jaeger; K D Mathias; R Drescher; E Hauth; G Bockisch; E Demirel; H M Gissler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Francesco Liistro; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Extracranial Revascularization Therapy: Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Alexander V. Khaw; H. Christian Schumacher; Philip M. Meyers; Rishi Gupta; Randall T. Higashida
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-06

Review 5.  [Proximal protection systems using carotid artery stent].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; U Dorenbeck; C Axmann; C Roth; T Struffert; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Periprocedural outcome for patients with carotid stenosis treated with endovascular therapy: a single center evaluation.

Authors:  Nicola Giannini; Alberto Chiti; Gino Gialdini; Eva Terni; Marta Gennaro; Guido Andrea Lazzarotti; Michele Puglioli; Giovanni Orlandi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Carotid Stenting without Angioplasty and without Protection: The Advantages of a Less Invasive Procedure.

Authors:  M Leonardi; M Dall'olio; L Raffi; P Cenni; L Simonetti; R Marasco; F Giagnorio
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow up.

Authors:  G Stankovic; F Liistro; S Moshiri; C Briguori; N Corvaja; G Gimelli; A Chieffo; M Montorfano; L Finci; V Spanos; C Di Mario; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).

Authors:  R Zahn; E Roth; T Ischinger; B Mark; M Hochadel; U Zeymer; K Haerten; K E Hauptmann; E-R von Leitner; A Schramm; W Kasper; J Senges
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-03

10.  Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A Kablak-Ziembicka; W Tracz; T Przewlocki; P Pieniazek; A Sokolowski; M Konieczynska
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.