Literature DB >> 7643045

The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

H Imamizu1, S Shimojo.   

Abstract

To assess the functional locus of visual-motor learning, the computational concepts of "task level" programming (determination of the trajectory of a hand during arm reaching in the Cartesian coordinates) and "manipulator level" programming (determination of the joint coordinates) was adopted. Because the former is likely to be hand nonspecific and the latter is hand specific, it is assumed that learning at the task level should be transferred to the unpracticed hand, whereas that at the manipulator level it should not. Under this assumption, the paradigm of intermanual transfer was used in an aiming task under rotated visual feedback. Nearly 100% intermanual transfer from the practiced hand to the unpracticed hand in the performance time of aiming was found, concluding that the locus of visual-motor learning should be at the task level rather than at the manipulator level.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643045     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  45 in total

1.  Intermanual transfer of force control is modulated by asymmetry of muscular strength.

Authors:  Luis Augusto Teixeira; Leandro Quedas Caminha
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Cerebellar internal models: implications for the dexterous use of tools.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Charles Worringham; Monika Thomas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of intermanual transfer induced by repetitive precision grip on input-output properties of untrained contralateral limb muscles.

Authors:  Nan Liang; Makoto Takahashi; Zhen Ni; Susumu Yahagi; Kozo Funase; Takashi Kato; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Acquisition and generalization of visuomotor transformations by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Chen Nathan; Thomas Boraud; Hagai Bergman; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.