Literature DB >> 9224856

Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks.

J R Tresilian1, G E Stelmach.   

Abstract

In two experiments comparisons between characteristics of performance of a unimanual and a bimanual reach-to-grasp (prehension) task were made on an individual subject basis. The unimanual prehension task used required that the object be grasped by finger and thumb pad opposition, the bimanual task required that the grasp be made by opposing the pads on the two index fingers. Experiment 1 examined adaptation of prehension movements to objects of different size (width) but equal grasp surface area placed at different distances. Experiment 2 examined adaptation of movements to objects of different grasp surface areas. It was found that the aperture and transport components of the two prehension tasks developed over time in very similar fashion in all subjects. Movements were adapted to different task constraints in the same way as has previously been reported in the literature and were very similar in both tasks: maximum aperture increases with increasing object size and occurs later in the movement for larger objects; movement time increases with target distance; time of maximum aperture occurs earlier in the movement for targets with smaller grasp surface areas; movement times are longer for such objects, largely due to increases in the deceleration phase of the movement. These results support the notion that there is an effector independent level of organization that governs the coordination of movements during performance of reaching and grasping tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224856     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Alice C Roy; Silvia Stefanini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Charles Worringham; Monika Thomas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Alexandra Grosskopf; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Memory and coordination in bimanual isometric finger force production.

Authors:  Nick J Davis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Kirstie Hughes; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Similarities between digits' movements in grasping, touching and pushing.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Juul Martin; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Parietal area BA7 integrates motor programs for reaching, grasping, and bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Ada Le; Michael Vesia; Xiaogang Yan; J Douglas Crawford; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Why are the digits' paths curved vertically in human grasping movements?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.