Literature DB >> 15749568

The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents.

Susannah H Bloch1, Robert E Short, Katherine W Ferrara, Erik R Wisner.   

Abstract

In this technical note, we study three polymer-shelled microbubble contrast agents manufactured by POINT Biomedical Corporation that have identical shell composition and mean volumetric diameters of 0.74 microm, 0.91 microm and 1.33 microm. We investigate the effect of agent size on the amplitude, frequency and probability of acoustic echoes received in response to five-cycle, 2.25-MHz pulses of varying pressure. We find that the amplitude and frequency response from the three agents is not significantly different. However, significant differences among the agents do exist in the probability of response to acoustic interrogation: at a pressure of 1.06 MPa, an echo from the 1.33 microm agent is 5 times as likely as an echo from the 0.91 microm agent and 18 times as likely as an echo from the 0.74 microm agent. We hypothesize that there exists an effective pressure-dependent threshold diameter above which single polymer-shelled agents respond to acoustic interrogation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749568     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Orlando Aristizábal; Rene G Williamson; Daniel H Turnbull
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sujeethraj Koppolu; Parag V Chitnis; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue microbubbles using light scattering.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Jingfeng Guan; Yuanyuan Qiu; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Paul Lee; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Marcel Böhmer; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhonggao Gao; Anne M Kennedy; Douglas A Christensen; Natalya Y Rapoport
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 7.  Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Charles F Caskey; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Biosurfactants for microbubble preparation and application.

Authors:  Qingyi Xu; Mitsutoshi Nakajima; Zengshe Liu; Takeo Shiina
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.