Literature DB >> 21580800

Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.

Parag V Chitnis, Paul Lee, Jonathan Mamou, John S Allen, Marcel Böhmer, Jeffrey A Ketterling.   

Abstract

Polymer-shelled micro-bubbles are employed as ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and vesicles for targeted drug delivery. UCA-based delivery of the therapeutic payload relies on ultrasound-induced shell rupture. The fragility of two polymer-shelled UCAs manufactured by Point Biomedical or Philips Research was investigated by characterizing their response to static overpressure. The nominal diameters of Point and Philips UCAs were 3 μm and 2 μm, respectively. The UCAs were subjected to static overpressure in a glycerol-filled test chamber with a microscope-reticule lid. UCAs were reconstituted in 0.1 mL of water and added over the glycerol surface in contact with the reticule. A video-microscope imaged UCAs as glycerol was injected (5 mL∕h) to vary the pressure from 2 to 180 kPa over 1 h. Neither UCA population responded to overpressure until the rupture threshold was exceeded, which resulted in abrupt destruction. The rupture data for both UCAs indicated three subclasses that exhibited different rupture behavior, although their mean diameters were not statistically different. The rupture pressures provided a measure of UCA fragility; the Philips UCAs were more resilient than Point UCAs. Results were compared to theoretical models of spherical shells under compression. Observed variations in rupture pressures are attributed to shell imperfections. These results may provide means to optimize polymeric UCAs for drug delivery and elucidate associated mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21580800      PMCID: PMC3094458          DOI: 10.1063/1.3565062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Phys        ISSN: 0021-8979            Impact factor:   2.546


  38 in total

1.  Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera.

Authors:  N de Jong; P J Frinking; A Bouakaz; M Goorden; T Schourmans; X Jingping; F Mastik
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  V Sboros; C M Moran; S D Pye; W N McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Ultrasound contrast agents for brain perfusion imaging and ischemic stroke therapy.

Authors:  Alberto Della Martina; Karsten Meyer-Wiethe; Eric Allémann; Günter Seidel
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery.

Authors:  Yiyao Liu; Hirokazu Miyoshi; Michihiro Nakamura
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Orlando Aristizábal; Rene G Williamson; Daniel H Turnbull
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.

Authors:  Esra Talu; Kanaka Hettiarachchi; Shukui Zhao; Robert L Powell; Abraham P Lee; Marjorie L Longo; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Thomas Barrack; Eleanor Stride
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles.

Authors:  F Calliada; R Campani; O Bottinelli; A Bozzini; M G Sommaruga
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice.

Authors:  F S Foster; M Y Zhang; Y Q Zhou; G Liu; J Mehi; E Cherin; K A Harasiewicz; B G Starkoski; L Zan; D A Knapik; S L Adamson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs.

Authors:  Klazina Kooiman; Marcel R Böhmer; Marcia Emmer; Hendrik J Vos; Ceciel Chlon; William T Shi; Christopher S Hall; Suzanne H P M de Winter; Karin Schroën; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Annemieke van Wamel
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

View more
  6 in total

1.  Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sujeethraj Koppolu; Parag V Chitnis; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; John A Hossack; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.121

3.  Characterisation of polymer shelled microbubbles in wall less flow phantom using high frequency ultrasound and video microscopy.

Authors:  P V Chitnis; P Lee; P A Dayton; J Mamou; J A Ketterling
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Sujeethraj Koppolu; Jonathan Mamou; Ceciel Chlon; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Collapse pressure measurement of single hollow glass microsphere using single-beam acoustic tweezer.

Authors:  Jinhee Yoo; Hyunhee Kim; Yeonggeun Kim; Hae Gyun Lim; Hyung Ham Kim
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.491

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.