Literature DB >> 17297826

Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.

Jeffrey A Ketterling, Jonathan Mamou, John S Allen, Orlando Aristizábal, Rene G Williamson, Daniel H Turnbull.   

Abstract

Few experimental and complementary theoretical studies have investigated high-frequency (>20 MHz) nonlinear responses from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents. Three polymer agents with different shell properties were examined for their single-bubble backscatter when excited with a 40 MHz tone burst. Higher-order harmonic responses were observed for the three agents; however, their occurrence was at least partly due to nonlinear propagation. Only one of the agents (1.1 microm mean diameter) showed a subharmonic response for longer excitations (approximately 10-15 cycles) and midlevel pressure excitations ( 2.5 MPa). Theoretical calculations of the backscattered spectrum revealed behavior similar to the experimental results in specific parameter regimes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297826      PMCID: PMC2675925          DOI: 10.1121/1.2401270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Shell waves and acoustic scattering from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  J S Allen; D E Kruse; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Influence of microbubble shell properties on ultrasound signal: Implications for low-power perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Howard Leong-Poi; Ji Song; Se-Joong Rim; Jonathan Christiansen; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.

Authors:  C M Moran; R J Watson; K A A Fox; W N McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Thomas J Matula; Andrew A Brayman; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents.

Authors:  Susannah H Bloch; Robert E Short; Katherine W Ferrara; Erik R Wisner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  Ayache Bouakaz; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  David E Goertz; Emmanuel Cherin; Andrew Needles; Raffi Karshafian; Allison S Brown; Peter N Burns; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Imaging and spectrum analysis of contrast agents in the in vivo rabbit eye using very-high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  C X Deng; F L Lizzi; R H Silverman; R Ursea; D J Coleman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.998

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Improving the sensitivity of high-frequency subharmonic imaging with coded excitation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Subharmonic analysis using singular-value decomposition of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jonathan Mamou; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Paul Lee; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Marcel Böhmer; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  High-Frequency Multipulse, Plane-Wave Acoustic Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Characterisation of polymer shelled microbubbles in wall less flow phantom using high frequency ultrasound and video microscopy.

Authors:  P V Chitnis; P Lee; P A Dayton; J Mamou; J A Ketterling
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

7.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Daniel Russakow; Tyler Rodgers; Kausik Sarkar; Michael Cochran; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.