Literature DB >> 22866229

Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

M-X Tang1, H Mulvana, T Gauthier, A K P Lim, D O Cosgrove, R J Eckersley, E Stride.   

Abstract

Ultrasound provides a valuable tool for medical diagnosis offering real-time imaging with excellent spatial resolution and low cost. The advent of microbubble contrast agents has provided the additional ability to obtain essential quantitative information relating to tissue vascularity, tissue perfusion and even endothelial wall function. This technique has shown great promise for diagnosis and monitoring in a wide range of clinical conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer, with considerable potential benefits in terms of patient care. A key challenge of this technique, however, is the existence of significant variations in the imaging results, and the lack of understanding regarding their origin. The aim of this paper is to review the potential sources of variability in the quantification of tissue perfusion based on microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound images. These are divided into the following three categories: (i) factors relating to the scanner setting, which include transmission power, transmission focal depth, dynamic range, signal gain and transmission frequency, (ii) factors relating to the patient, which include body physical differences, physiological interaction of body with bubbles, propagation and attenuation through tissue, and tissue motion, and (iii) factors relating to the microbubbles, which include the type of bubbles and their stability, preparation and injection and dosage. It has been shown that the factors in all the three categories can significantly affect the imaging results and contribute to the variations observed. How these factors influence quantitative imaging is explained and possible methods for reducing such variations are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical ultrasound; microbubble contrast agent; perfusion quantification; quantitative imaging; variation

Year:  2011        PMID: 22866229      PMCID: PMC3262271          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  108 in total

1.  High-resolution functional imaging with ultrasound contrast agents based on RF processing in an in vivo kidney experiment.

Authors:  X A Verbeek; J M Willigers; F W Prinzen; M Peschar; L A Ledoux; A P Hoeks
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves.

Authors:  Thomas P Gauthier; Michalakis A Averkiou; Edward L S Leen
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  The onset of microbubble vibration.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Dave E Goertz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Thomas Barrack; Eleanor Stride
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A new noninvasive technique for cardiac pressure measurement: resonant scattering of ultrasound from bubbles.

Authors:  W M Fairbank; M O Scully
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Experimental air embolism: measurement of microbubbles using the Coulter counter.

Authors:  D C Grulke; N A Marsh; B A Hills
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1973-12

10.  Quantitative microbubble enhanced transrectal ultrasound as a tool for monitoring hormonal treatment of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Eckersley; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Martin J K Blomley; Hessel Wijkstra; Nandita M deSouza; David O Cosgrove; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  47 in total

1.  Simplified approach for the assessment of kidney perfusion and acute kidney injury at the bedside using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Ivan Göcze; Philipp Renner; Bernhard M Graf; Hans J Schlitt; Thomas Bein; Karin Pfister
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dual-Frequency Piezoelectric Endoscopic Transducer for Imaging Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Jinwook Kim; Paul A Dayton; Xiaoning Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Improvement of the accuracy of liver lesion DCEUS quantification with the use of automatic respiratory gating.

Authors:  Damianos Christofides; Edward L S Leen; Michalakis A Averkiou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast Enhanced Superharmonic Imaging for Acoustic Angiography Using Reduced Form-Factor Lateral Mode Transmitters for Intravascular and Intracavity Applications.

Authors:  Zhuochen Wang; K Heath Martin; Wenbin Huang; Paul A Dayton; Xiaoning Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Marcus Stangeland; Trond Engjom; Martin Mezl; Radovan Jirik; Odd Helge Gilja; Georg Dimcevski; Kim Nylund
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-09-12

7.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  A Pilot Clinical Study in Characterization of Malignant Renal-cell Carcinoma Subtype with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sandeep K Kasoji; Emily H Chang; Lee B Mullin; Wui K Chong; W Kimryn Rathmell; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Acute Effect of Hookah Smoking on the Human Coronary Microcirculation.

Authors:  Michael D Nelson; Mary Rezk-Hanna; Florian Rader; O'Neil R Mason; Xiu Tang; Sarah Shidban; Ryan Rosenberry; Neal L Benowitz; Donald P Tashkin; Robert M Elashoff; Jonathan R Lindner; Ronald G Victor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Quantitative correlational study of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging of glioma and early response to radiotherapy in a rat model.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Antonella Mangraviti; Lin Su; Kai Zhang; Yin Zhang; Bin Zhang; Wenxiao Li; Betty Tyler; John Wong; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Esteban Velarde; Jinyuan Zhou; Kai Ding
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.