Literature DB >> 20457726

Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Earl E Johnson1, Todd A Ricketts.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop and examine a list of potential variables that may account for variability in the dispensing rates of four common hearing aid features. A total of 29 potential variables were identified and placed into the following categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's patient population, and (4) evidence-based practice grades of recommendation for each feature. The potentially associative variables then were examined using regression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey. There was a direct relation between price and level of hearing aid technology with the frequency of dispensing product features. There was also a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and the frequency of dispensing that feature. In general, the results suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongly to dispensing rates of product features than to differences in characteristics of the patient population served by audiologists. An additional finding indicated that evidence-based practice recommendations were inversely related to dispensing rates of product features. This finding, however, may not be the result of dispensing trends as much as hearing aid manufacturing trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457726      PMCID: PMC4111506          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810362988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  52 in total

1.  Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Dafydd Stephens; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Cynthia M Beyer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The effect of generic competition on the price of brand-name drugs.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  An objective procedure for evaluation of adaptive antifeedback algorithms in hearing aids.

Authors:  Daniel J Freed; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Directional hearing aid benefit in listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  The effect of digital phase cancellation feedback reduction systems on amplified sound quality.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  The limits of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  M R Tonelli
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.258

9.  Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

Authors:  K L Kahn; W H Rogers; L V Rubenstein; M J Sherwood; E J Reinisch; E B Keeler; D Draper; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice.

Authors:  R Tamblyn; M Abrahamowicz; C Brailovsky; P Grand'Maison; J Lescop; J Norcini; N Girard; J Haggerty
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.